[Wien] supercell minimisation
Jorissen Kevin
Kevin.Jorissen at ua.ac.be
Thu Oct 23 17:16:35 CEST 2003
Hi Michael,
I think there's no problem in keeping some atoms fixed and letting others move. For larger systems, it can be the only way to get things to converge.
In fact, it would be great if we could reduce the number of free parameters even further, e.g., by letting only the distance between layers relax, etc.
Kevin.
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Michael Gurnett [mailto:michael.gurnett at kau.se]
Verzonden: vr 10/17/2003 5:50
Aan: wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
CC:
Onderwerp: [Wien] supercell minimisation
I have an 8 layer Ge(111) supercell which I'm trying to minimise. One
side is terminated with H. During minimisation is it enough to just let
the bottom 2 layers move and the top three. I tried initially letting
all atoms move but I've got to a point where mini just can reduce
anymore. Was therefore thinking of starting again from the
unreconstructed supercell.
Hope someone has some ideas
Thanks
Michael
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 4466 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20031023/b094ec7e/attachment.bin
More information about the Wien
mailing list