[Wien] SP+SO calculation
Shunli Shang
S.Shang at tnw.tudelft.nl
Tue Jul 20 19:53:09 CEST 2004
Dear Prof. Peter Blaha,
Thanks for your reply. In my calculation, the Fe-3s and Fe-3p are treaded
as semi-core. About the case.in2(c) file, I always use the default values,
the four values in second line are: " -9.0 100.0 0.50 0.05".
I have tried to change all the possible parameters to do the SP+SO
calculation, but no help. The program cannot find the semicore states of Fe.
In the following I would like to show you the strange EPL001 and EPH001
values of Fe printed in case.scf and case.output2up files of SP+SP
calculation after the convergent SP calculation.
Could you please give me suggestions, or maybe in my case, Fe only has
valence states?
By the way, for the cases of HCP-Fe and hexagonal Fe2C (SG_ 164_P-3m1), they
are fine, no problem for the SP+SO calculation. For the cases of Fe6C1
(SG_162_P-31m), Fe6C2 (SG_182_P6322) and Fe6C3 (SG_162_P-31m), they have the
same problems: can not find the semicore states in SP+SO calculations.
Best regards,
Shunli Shang
*************************
Only SP calculation for Fe6C1 (the spin-up results for the last cycle, the
correct results):
Energy to separate semicore and valencestates: 0.23488
:FER : F E R M I - ENERGY(TETRAH.M.)= 0.83700
:PCS001: PARTIAL CHARGES SPHERE = 1
S,P,D,F,PX,PY,PZ,D-Z2,D-X2Y2,D-XY,D-XZ,D-YZ
:QTL001: 1.0647 3.0116 3.7450 0.0032 1.0032 1.0062 1.0021 0.7337 0.7465
0.7141 0.7909 0.7597
Q-s-low E-s-low Q-p-low E-p-low Q-d-low E-d-low Q-f-low
E-f-low
:EPL001: 1.0005 -5.5980 2.9508 -3.1402 0.0108 -0.0751
0.0004 -0.1835
Q-s-hi E-s-hi Q-p-hi E-p-hi Q-d-hi E-d-hi Q-f-hi E-f-hi
:EPH001: 0.0641 0.4686 0.0608 0.5810 3.7342 0.6751 0.0029
0.6113
*************************
SP+SO calculation (the spin-up results for the first cycle of SP+SO
calculation after the convergent SP calculation)
Energy to separate semicore and valencestates:-999.00000
:FER : F E R M I - ENERGY(TETRAH.M.)= 0.82510
:PCS001: PARTIAL CHARGES SPHERE = 1
S,P,D,F,PX,PY,PZ,D-Z2,D-X2Y2,D-XY,D-XZ,D-YZ
:QTL001: 1.0641 3.0471 3.7042 0.0037 1.0056 0.8872 0.8226 0.7236 0.7379
0.7061 0.7854 0.7510
Q-s-low E-s-low Q-p-low E-p-low Q-d-low E-d-low Q-f-low
E-f-low
:EPL001: 0.0000 10.0000 0.0000 10.0000 0.0000 10.0000 0.0000
10.0000
Q-s-hi E-s-hi Q-p-hi E-p-hi Q-d-hi E-d-hi Q-f-hi E-f-hi
:EPH001: 1.0641 -5.2356 3.0471 -3.0663 3.7042 0.6695
0.0037 -0.0744
*************************
SP+SO calculation (some strange results shown in case.output2up file for the
first cycle of SP+SO calculation after the convergent SP calculation).
number of occupied bands: 103
highest energy: 0.873929976078531
Bandranges (emin - emax):
band 1 -9.98505085982580 -5.64126602440761
band 2 -8.59789957521298 -5.64059028470795
band 49 -2.92032502323060 -5.96874600200437D-002
band 50 -2.91947964393872 -5.59045829250948D-002
band 51 -9.73140285226681D-002 0.362743687682807
band 52 -9.28189398976315D-002 0.380337011265983
*************************
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Blaha" <pblaha at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
To: <wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Wien] SP+SO calculation
> From your description I can see, that with runsp -so everything is ok
> (QTL-B values below 5 are not perfect, but not a real problem).
>
> Do you treat Fe 3p states in the bandstructure ? In that case you
definitely
> should be able to find a seperation energy.
>
> You must examin case.scf and case.output2up/dn (bandranges). Together
> with a meaningfull case.in2 (did you change anything there in the 2nd line
?)
> it should work.
>
> Regards
>
> > (4) perform the "runsp_lapw -so" calculation.
> >
> > In each SCF cycle there are messages:
> >
> > QTL-B VALUE .EQ. (<5)
> >
> > Energy to separate semicore and valencestates:-999.00000
> >
> > After convergence, the obtained properties seem OK (?), e.g. the HFF and
> > Total energy.
> >
> >
> >
> > (5) perform the "runsp_lapw -so -in1new 2" calculation
> >
> > In each SCF cycle there is message:
> >
> > Energy to separate semicore and valencestates:-999.00000
> >
> > The obtained HFF is unreasonable. (after 20 times SCF cycles, still no
> > convergent evidence).
> >
> >
> >
> > Could you please tell me why the energy to separate semicore and
> > valencestates is so large (-999.00)? and could you please give me some
> > suggestions? Please let me know if you need more information.
>
>
>
> P.Blaha
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
> Phone: +43-1-58801-15671 FAX: +43-1-58801-15698
> Email: blaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at WWW:
http://info.tuwien.ac.at/theochem/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>
>
More information about the Wien
mailing list