[Wien] re : Supercells - what is the right procedure to create
an acceptable one?]
Torsten Andersen
thor at physik.uni-kl.de
Wed Jun 16 15:04:57 CEST 2004
Dear George
George Amolo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to thank Laurence Marks and Torsten Andersen for their kind
> suggestions. However, part of the query still remains unanswered. I am
> pressing on so that the more experienced users could share their ideas
> with beginners like me. How do I tell that my supercell is structurally
> correct? This is because the initialization process puts forth many
Visualise it, for example with XCrySDen...
> suggestions which one is not sure whether to accept or reject.
sgroup will suggest you a minimal cell, and if it is different from what
you expect, there is probably an error in your input. Again, you should
visualise it...
> I expected
> Torsten to also indicate to me, like he did to Yaron and Angelica, that I
> need to start the construction of the supercell from a P-struct rather
Yeah... it is the most fool-proof way of constructing supercells, IMHO.
Then, afterwards, let sgroup do the work for you if it can be reduced.
But why should I repeat it if you have seen it already?
> than providing the spacegroup. Is it just a matter of trying until Wien2k
> accepts your proposed structure? As a learner I think I am looking for
> some consistency in the method so that should I find it necessary to deal
> with another supercell containing other atoms I have a basis to fall back
> to. Cheers.
<g> have fun.
Torsten Andersen.
>
> george
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>
--
Dr. Torsten Andersen TA-web: http://deep.at/myspace/
AG Hübner, Department of Physics, Kaiserslautern University
http://cmt.physik.uni-kl.de http://www.physik.uni-kl.de/
More information about the Wien
mailing list