[Wien] problem with energy convergence
strutza at bgumail.bgu.ac.il
strutza at bgumail.bgu.ac.il
Thu Mar 11 18:28:30 CET 2004
> Hello Wien2k users!
>
>
>
> I have problem with energy convergence, the parameters that I used is:
> Rmax=9, mix=0.4 and I took kmesh=50. The energy convergence =0.0001Ry. Here
> are the results:
>
>
>
> --- ENE -----------
>
> :ENE : ********** TOTAL ENERGY IN Ry = -24021.848965
>
> :ENE : ********** TOTAL ENERGY IN Ry = -24021.860569
>
> :ENE : ********** TOTAL ENERGY IN Ry = -24021.879533
>
> :ENE : ********** TOTAL ENERGY IN Ry = -24021.886065
>
> :ENE : ********** TOTAL ENERGY IN Ry = -24021.892995
>
> :ENE : ********** TOTAL ENERGY IN Ry = -24021.916703
>
> :ENE : ********** TOTAL ENERGY IN Ry = -24021.957049
>
> :ENE : ********** TOTAL ENERGY IN Ry = -24022.042321
>
> :ENE : ********** TOTAL ENERGY IN Ry = -24022.052118
>
> :ENE : *WARNING** TOTAL ENERGY IN Ry = -24022.061428
>
> --- DIS -----------
>
> :DIS : CHARGE DISTANCE 0.3933245
>
> :DIS : CHARGE DISTANCE 0.3875391
>
> :DIS : CHARGE DISTANCE 0.3743100
>
> :DIS : CHARGE DISTANCE 0.3718883
>
> :DIS : CHARGE DISTANCE 0.3729222
>
> :DIS : CHARGE DISTANCE 0.3450249
>
> :DIS : CHARGE DISTANCE 0.3055749
>
> :DIS : CHARGE DISTANCE 0.2449718
>
> :DIS : CHARGE DISTANCE 0.2294169
>
> :DIS : CHARGE DISTANCE 0.2018121
>
>
>
> I tried to change Rmax to 10 in one case and to reduce the mixing parameter
> to 0.2 instead of 0.4, but the convergence get even worse in both cases.
>
> I know that I need to enlarge the number of k points, but the SCF
> calculation takes to much time.
>
> My question is, is there an option to improve the convergence, without
> taking bigger number of k points.
>
> Also is it possible to continue the SCF calculations after 20 iterations.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Angelica
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20040311/91fec320/forward.html
More information about the Wien
mailing list