[Wien] Charged supercells
Daniel Fernández Hevia
dhevia at physics.usyd.edu.au
Fri May 14 04:03:09 CEST 2004
Dear WIEN2k users and developers,
I have a couple of doubts about charged supercells.
1 For the case of charged isolated charged impurities, my question is if
the next sequence of steps is correct:
1.1 Construct the supercell with all the neutral atoms and run (manually,
not with w2web) instgen.
1.2 Edit the case.inst file and I add/remove electrons in the electronic
shell structure of the impurity atom.
1.3 Then, I go on with the whole initialization process by typing
init_lapw. Up to now, lstart always complains, issuing a message like
NUMBER OF ELECTRONS NE IZ 7.00000000000 8
but, up to now, this has never been a problem: I just ignore this message
and go through all the initialization process.
1.4 Check that the proper number of electrons appear in case.in2c. Also, I
change the parameter bgch in case.inm (for example, if I removed 1 electron
from an oxygen atom, then I type a -1 in case.inm). By the way, is there
any stringent format for this parameter? I mean, I have exactly the
following in the first line of the case.inm file:
BROYD -1.0 YES
With 1 space between D and the - and two spaces between the 0 and the
Y ... is that correct?
1.5 Finally, I run the scf.
According to the few discussions of these procedure that I have found in
the mailing list, I would have no doubt that this is the correct procedure.
However, I found a message from Prof. Blaha dated 7 March 2002 in which he
answered a doubt question on charged systems by saying:
... In order to make this properly in WIEN, you should "specify" the missing
charge in case.inm (Otherwise mixer renormalizes the interstitial charge).
In addition, I would never again run lstart/dstart (or init_lapw), but just
edit case.in2, remove the desired number of electrons and then run_lapw.
So now I am a bit confused and I should like to know if the above described
process is generally correct or if there can be exceptions. Should I, or
should I not, run lstart/dstart?
2 My second doubt deals with case of a charged vacancy or an impurity
complex. I have not found information about this in the mailing list. The
point is ... where do I add/remove electrons in the case.inm file in these
cases? Say I study the N vacancy in AlN. With all the neutral atoms I find
the expected additional eigenvalues: a a1 (s-like) state just above the
valence band (occupied by two electrons) and three degenerate t2 (p-like)
states, which are resonances in the conduction band, and are occupied by
just one electron. Now, I should like to remove this last electron,
creating a VN1+, i.e., the vacancy in a 1+ charge state. How do I do it?
Should I remove one electron of, say, one of the four neighboring Al atoms?
The same question raises for impurity clusters: If I work with, say, a MgO
cluster in AlN, and I find that occupied states appear in the band gap, how
do I give the cluster a 1+ charge state? Is there a rule for deciding from
which one of the atoms in the cluster should I remove 1 electron?
Of course, any struct or whatsoever file in which you can be interested is
at your disposal: just ask me.
I thank you in advance for any comments, suggestions or ideas about these
topics: this mailing list is really an invaluable source of knowledge!!!
Best regards
Daniel
-------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Fernández Hevia
School of Physics
The University of Sydney
Sydney 2006, Australia
Phone: +61 2 9036 5301
email: <mailto:danielhf at physics.usyd.edu.au>danielhf at physics.usyd.edu.au
-----------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20040514/3aefefba/attachment.html
More information about the Wien
mailing list