[Wien] final states and case.inc
Michael Gurnett
michael.gurnett at kau.se
Thu Sep 30 16:37:55 CEST 2004
Does this mean I should remove half an electron from the p1/2 state and then
do the same for the p3/2 state and then take the weighted average of the two
energies to get the 2p final state?, or is the general practice just to do
one of them and present only energy data that doesn't include 2pp (this is
for comparison to surface core level shift data)
regards
Michael
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jorissen Kevin" <Kevin.Jorissen at ua.ac.be>
To: <wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 4:19 PM
Subject: RE: [Wien] final states and case.inc
Yes !
These lines correspond to p1/2 and p3/2 electrons, respectively.
Kevin Jorissen
EMAT - Electron Microscopy for Materials Science
(http://webhost.ua.ac.be/emat/)
Dept. of Physics
UA - Universiteit Antwerpen
Groenenborgerlaan 171
B-2020 Antwerpen
Belgium
tel +32 3 2653249
fax + 32 3 2653257
e-mail kevin.jorissen at ua.ac.be
________________________________
Van: wien-admin at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at namens Michael Gurnett
Verzonden: do 30-9-2004 14:15
Aan: wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Onderwerp: [Wien] final states and case.inc
The file case.inc has the following entries for Si (2p states have been
treated as core)
4 0.00 NUMBER OF ORBITALS (EXCLUDING SPIN), SHIFT
1,-1,2 ( N,KAPPA,OCCUP)
2,-1,2 ( N,KAPPA,OCCUP)
2, 1,2 ( N,KAPPA,OCCUP)
2,-2,4 ( N,KAPPA,OCCUP)
Now I would like to remove half an electron from the Si 2p state. My
question is does it make a diiference if I remove it from the second from
last or the last row.
Thanks.........
Michael
More information about the Wien
mailing list