[Wien] Energy range problem in XSPEC
SWG
sw.goh at unsw.edu.au
Sun May 15 17:23:55 CEST 2005
Dear Prof Blaha and Wien users,
Yes. I did rerun x lapw2 -qtl after x lapw1.
If I am looking at the output files correctly, my case.output1 does not seem
to contain eigenvalues at high energies and neither could I see any high
energy value in output2.
Case.output1: WARNING: RKmax reduced due to NMATMAX
Case.output2: BAND#1000 E= 0.63270 WEIGHT= 0.0000000
Case.outputt: EMAX reduced due to lower HIGHEST BAND-minimum
In the manual, the rough guide given for NMATMAX=10000 ==> 1GB (==> cells
with about 80-150 atoms/unitcell. My PC has 2GB RAM and the Cu2S specimen
has 144 atoms/unitcell. Hence, I do not know why it is giving me NMATMAX
problem.
Please advice me on what to do. Should I reduce the number of k-points in
the initialization section; x kgen?
Regards,
Siew Wei GOH
School of Chemistry
University of New South Wales
Sydney NSW 2052, Australia
Tel: +61 (2) 9385 5519
-----Original Message-----
From: wien-bounces at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
[mailto:wien-bounces at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at] On Behalf Of Peter Blaha
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 5:20 PM
To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Subject: Re: [Wien] Energy range problem in XSPEC
> Following the advise in the manual, I increased EMAX in case.in1 up to 4.0
> Ry and rerun x lapw1. Then I edited case.inxs to calculate LIII-spectrum
in
> the energy range between -2 and 15 eV. However, when I plotted the
spectrum,
> the energy is only between -2 to ~ 2.5 eV! I do not understand why this is
> so when it had plotted an energy range between -2 to 15 eV when I
attempted
> TiC as an example.
After x lapw1 did you rerun x lapw2 -qtl ???
Have a look into the output files.
case.output1 : does it contain eigenvalues at high energies ?
output2: (at the bottom) is there a high energy ?
outputt : (tetra) does it complain about limiting the E-range due to
lower Energy of highest band?
>
> On another attempt, I tried to change the emin/emax windows in case.in1
> (K-VECTORS FROM UNIT) from "4 -7.0 4.0" to "4 -2.0 4.0". This
> inadvertently decreases the max energy from ~2.5 to 1.0 eV.
Using -2.0 means, you cut-off some low lying states. (check output1
to see its effect). Don't do this.
P.Blaha
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-15671 FAX: +43-1-58801-15698
Email: blaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at WWW:
http://info.tuwien.ac.at/theochem/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20050515/512db24d/attachment.html
More information about the Wien
mailing list