[Wien] Q:How many k-points are appropriate in a calculation
on supercell
Jiang Jun
czjiangjun at hpsv.pku.edu.cn
Tue Nov 15 19:42:57 CET 2005
Dear Stefaan:
Thank you greatly for your warmly reply!
In fact,I chose the k-mesh size and basis set after TEST for my special
system. My statement is not rigorous.
If I mesh 56 k-points in the IBZ of a small cell,only 7 points (with the same
RKmax) is needed for the IBZ of a supercell cell.
That is a good news for me!
Thank you again!
Jun Jiang
> >Usually, I chose 1000-3000 k-points in a unit cell with RminKmax=7.00.
> >
> >
> >
> Such a statement is dangerous. k-mesh size and basis set size must
> always be TESTED. There are no safe default values. With a choice as you
> state it, you might sometimes be using unneccessary computer resources,
> or (worse) sometimes be producing uncorrect results.
>
> >It takes too much time,if I still keep 3000 k-points in the SCF.
> >
> >How many k-points are appropriate when dealing with a 2*2*2 supercell?
> >Is it feasible to choose 300 k-points or decrease the value of RminKmax to
> >6.00?
> >
> >
> First test the k-mesh (and RKmax) for the small cell. A 2x2x2 cell is 8
> times larger, hence the IBZ is 8 times smaller. A k-mesh of the same
> quality as for you small cell contains 8 times *less* points in the IBZ
> for your supercell.
>
> Stefaan
>
> Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
More information about the Wien
mailing list