[Wien] about MATRIX size and RMT
L. D. Marks
L-marks at northwestern.edu
Wed Aug 9 21:39:18 CEST 2006
Keep RKMAX/Min_RMT a constant by adjusting RKMAX for different Min_RMT.
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, MoonfalL wrote:
> Dear Mark:
> As you said at the topic '"Best" RMT for a given total matrix size ' :
> *"For a fixed matrix size (by adjusting RKMAX** appropriately), run a series
> of small calculations (e.g. a simple bulk **material) varying the RMT's to
> find the lowest energy. For instance, with a **binary AB run with
> RMT_B=constant-RMT_A ....."*
> *I want to know *
> * 1) how to set a fixed matrix size by adjusting
> RKMAX appropriately?*
> * for example:
>
> case.scf1
> :RKM : MATRIX SIZE 565LOs: 36 RKM= 8.31 WEIGHT=
> 1.00 PGR
>
> case.scf2
> :GMA : POTENTIAL AND CHARGE CUT-OFF 14.00 Ry**.5
>
> RMT(A)= 2.05 RNT(B)= 2.15
>
> the MATRIX SIZE is 565, why? I set RKM=8.5, why there is
> RKM= 8.31 ? KMAX=8.31/2.05 then why POTENTIAL AND CHARGE CUT-OFF
> 14.00Ry**.5? larger then 2*Gmax ?
>
> 2) RMT_B=constant-RMT_A , but the 'constant' = ??
>
> Does the constant influence the result?
>
> 3) the MATRIX size will influence the result ? how does the MATRIX
> size influence the system's total energy?
> *
> *Thanks!*
> **
> *Best regards!*
> *
> Pengfei *
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Guan Pengfei, Ph. D
> Inst.f. Physics, Tsinghua U, Beijing, China
> Phone: +86-010-6218-2756 Mobile: +86-138-1060-9671
> Email: miracle.fei at gmail.com
> WWW: http://www.phys.tsinghua.edu.cn
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
-----------------------------------------------
Laurence Marks
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
MSE Rm 2036 Cook Hall
2220 N Campus Drive
Northwestern University
Evanston, IL 60208, USA
Tel: (847) 491-3996 Fax: (847) 491-7820
email: L-marks at northwestern dot edu
http://www.numis.northwestern.edu
-----------------------------------------------
More information about the Wien
mailing list