[Wien] Difference between runsp_lapw runsp_c_lapw
Peter Blaha
pblaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Tue Mar 14 01:21:54 CET 2006
runsp_c_lapw has NOTHING to do with complex calculations but "constrains"
the magnetic moment in a "spin-polarized setup to zero (i.e. does a
non-spinpolarized calculation even with a "spinpolarized setup".
Usefull for LDA+U calculations, which require the "spin-polarized setup",
but you may want to have a nonmagnetic solution.
PS: I'm sure this is described in the UG
Regards
> Dear WIEN users,
>
> Complex calculations are performed for systems without inversion symmetry.
>
> QUESTION: I have a system without inversion symmetry (with input files case.in1c, case.in2c, etc.) and I want to perform a spin polarized calculation using charge
> convergence.
>
> Do I use
>
> runsp_lapw -i 20 -cc 0.00001
>
> OR
>
> runsp_c_lapw -i 20 -cc 0.00001 ?
>
> I am asking because the user guide does not explicitly state the difference
> between runsp_lapw and runsp_c_lapw.
>
> Thank you.
>
> J. Appleton
>
P.Blaha
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-15671 FAX: +43-1-58801-15698
Email: blaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at WWW: http://info.tuwien.ac.at/theochem/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Wien
mailing list