[Wien] Optical conductivity of fcc(001) Co with (001 ) magnetization direction.
swarup saha
saha18swarup at gmail.com
Sun Nov 5 18:17:43 CET 2006
Dear wien2k user,
I am doing optical calculation for fcc(001)
Co with [001] magnetisation. Changes in the files
case.inso
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WFFIL
4 1 0 llmax,ipr,kpot
-10.0000 1.50000 emin,emax (output energy window)
0. 0. 1. direction of magnetization (lattice vectors)
0 number of atoms for which RLO is added
0 -4.97 0.005 atom number,e-lo,de (case.in1), repeat NX times
0 0 0 0 0 number of atoms for which SO is switch off;
atoms
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
case.in2c
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FERMI (TOT,FOR,QTL,EFG,FERMI)
-9.0 15.0 0.50 0.05 EMIN, NE, ESEPERMIN, ES
TETRA 101 (GAUSS,ROOT,TEMP,TETRA,ALL eval)
0 0 2 0 4 0 4 4 6 0 6 4
14. GMAX
FILE FILE/NOFILE write recprlist
~
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Changed structure files after running initso case.struct
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Co s-o calc. M|| 0.00 0.00 1.00
F 1 25_F
RELA
6.689633 6.689633 6.689633 90.000000 90.000000 90.000000
ATOM 1: X=0.00000000 Y=0.00000000 Z=0.00000000
MULT= 1 ISPLIT= 2
Co NPT= 781 R0=.000100000 RMT= 2.35000 Z: 27.00000
LOCAL ROT MATRIX: 1.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000
0.0000000 1.0000000 0.0000000
0.0000000 0.0000000 1.0000000
16 NUMBER OF SYMMETRY OPERATIONS
-1 0 0 0.0000000
0-1 0 0.0000000
0 0-1 0.0000000
1
0 1 0 0.0000000
-1 0 0 0.0000000
0 0-1 0.0000000
2
0-1 0 0.0000000
1 0 0 0.0000000
0 0-1 0.0000000
3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
After init_lapw i run
runsp_lapw
initso_lapw
then i again run init_lapw due to change of the structure files after
this calculation i ran
runsp_lapw -so
for optic calculation
change TOT to FERMI in case.in2c
runsp_lapw -so -s lapw1 -e lcore
x opticc -so -up
x joint -up
x kram -up
here the three files
case.inop
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
244 1 number of k-points, first k-point
-5.0 2.2 Emin, Emax for matrix elements
1 number of choices (columns in *outmat) - 0: MME into case.mme
1 Re xx
OFF ON/OFF writes MME to unit 4
Choices:
1......Re <x><x>
2......Re <y><y>
3......Re <z><z>
4......Re <x><y>
5......Re <x><z>
6......Re <y><z>
7......Im <x><y>
8......Im <x><z>
9......Im <y><z>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
case.injoint 1 20 : LOWER AND UPPER BANDINDEX
0.0000 0.00100 1.0000 : EMIN DE EMAX FOR ENERGYGRID IN ryd
eV : output units eV / ryd / cm-1
4 : SWITCH
1 : NUMBER OF COLUMNS
0.1 0.1 0.3 : BROADENING (FOR DRUDE MODEL - switch 6,7 -
ONLY)
SWITCH:
0...JOINTDOS FOR EACH BAND COMBINATION
1...JOINTDOS AS SUM OVER ALL BAND COMBINATIONS
2...DOS FOR EACH BAND
3...DOS AS SUM OVER ALL BANDS
4...Im(EPSILON)
5...Im(EPSILON) for each band combination
6...INTRABAND contributions
7...INTRABAND contributions including band analysis
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
case.inkram
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.1 Gamma: broadening of interband spectrum
1.0 energy shift (scissors operator)
0 add intraband contributions? yes/no: 1/0
12.60 plasma frequencies (from joint, opt 6)
0.20 Gammas for Drude terms
~
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think here are all the necessary changes are done as manual. Then i plot
case.sigmak for optical plot and plot is not matches with published fig.
I checked the calculation very well but i can not what is the wrong here.
I have another question why we write atom no 0 in the case.inso
files .
Any kind of suggestion regarding this problem highly appreciated.
With best regards,
Swarup Saha
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20061105/821dc977/attachment.html
More information about the Wien
mailing list