[Wien] Orbital polarization error

Roberto Iglesias roberto.iglesias at psi.ch
Thu Oct 12 17:47:29 CEST 2006


Yes, there is something strange in case.output2up. The information on the bands, wave functions and charges 
does not appear, the file is truncated below:

> BZ-integration with TETRA-program. icor=:           1

The corresponding .output2dn seems to be correct, though.

Running the last command from the terminal gives the same STDOUT as before, which I did not post. This is it:

> LAPW0 END
>  LAPW1 END
>  LAPW1 END
> LAPWSO END
>  LAPW2 END
>  LAPW2 END
> LAPWDM END
>  CORE  END
>  CORE  END
>  MIXER END
> in cycle 2    ETEST: 0   CTEST: 0
>  LAPW0 END
>  ORB   END
>  ORB   END
>  LAPW1 END
>  LAPW1 END
> LAPWSO END
> forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
> Image              PC        Routine            Line        Source
> lapw2c             0807AB43  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
> lapw2c             08079F5F  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
> lapw2c             0809CD75  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
> lapw2c             0804BDC5  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
> libc.so.6          00B1EE23  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
> lapw2c             0804BD01  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown

Thanks for your suggestion!

Roberto




Laurence Marks wrote:
> It's often hard to find exactly where the errors are. Try:
> 1) Looking at the case.output2XX files
> 2) Running the last command by hand at the terminal
> 
> On 10/12/06, Roberto Iglesias <roberto.iglesias at psi.ch> wrote:
>> Hello all!
>>
>> I've seen a problem exactly as mine in the mailing list, but no answers. Please, follow the link:
>>
>> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/2003-August/000533.html
>>
>> The only difference is that my inorb file looks like:
>>
>> 2  1  0               nmod, natorb, ipr
>> PRATT, 1.0            mixmod, amix
>> 1 1 2                 iatom nlorb, lorb
>> 1                     nmodop (in the original post it had 0 value)
>> 1                     Ncalc
>> 1. 1. 1.              direction of M
>>
>> This is my case.dayfile:
>>
>>      start      (Thu Oct 12 17:03:27 CEST 2006) with lapw0 (200/20 to go)
>>
>>      cycle 1    (Thu Oct 12 17:03:27 CEST 2006)         (200/20 to go)
>>
>>  >   lapw0      (17:03:27) 0.877u 0.023s 0:00.89 100.0% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
>>  >   lapw1  -up         (17:03:28) 5.728u 0.977s 0:06.77 98.8%  0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
>>  >   lapw1  -dn         (17:03:34) 5.728u 0.989s 0:06.72 99.7%  0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
>>  >   lapwso -up -orb    (17:03:41) 3.806u 0.880s 0:04.70 99.5%  0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
>>  >   lapw2 -c -up -so   (17:03:46) 7.481u 0.567s 0:08.08 99.5%  0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
>>  >   lapw2 -c -dn -so   (17:03:54) 7.443u 0.581s 0:08.09 99.1%  0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
>>  >   lapwdm -up  -so -c (17:04:02) 0.598u 0.090s 0:00.68 100.0% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
>>  >   lcore -up  (17:04:03) 0.011u 0.019s 0:00.03 66.6%  0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
>>  >   lcore -dn  (17:04:03) 0.019u 0.011s 0:00.03 66.6%  0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
>>  >   mixer      (17:04:03) 0.057u 0.027s 0:00.08 87.5%  0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
>> :ENERGY convergence:  0 0.00001 0
>> :CHARGE convergence:  0 0.0001 0
>>
>>      cycle 2    (Thu Oct 12 17:04:03 CEST 2006)         (199/19 to go)
>>
>>  >   lapw0      (17:04:03) 0.877u 0.027s 0:00.90 98.8%  0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
>>  >   orb -up    (17:04:04) 0.041u 0.001s 0:00.04 100.0% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
>>  >   orb -dn    (17:04:04) 0.039u 0.002s 0:00.04 75.0%  0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
>>  >   lapw1  -up         (17:04:04) 5.702u 1.024s 0:06.73 99.8%  0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
>>  >   lapw1  -dn         (17:04:11) 5.725u 0.987s 0:06.71 99.8%  0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
>>  >   lapwso -up -orb    (17:04:18) 2.542u 0.182s 0:02.72 100.0% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
>>  >   lapw2 -c -up -so   (17:04:21) 0.010u 0.003s 0:00.01 100.0% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
>> error: command   /home/l_iglesias/WIEN2k/lapw2c uplapw2.def   failed
>>
>>  >   stop error
>>
>>
>> The comment in uplapw2.error file is just "Error in LAPW2".
>>
>>
>> I had previously performed a spin orbit calculation, with the direction of M set also as 1. 1. 1., and it
>> reached convergence without problems.
>> And also in my case, calculations along 0. 0. 1. and 1. 1. 0 run perfectly.
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Roberto
>>
>> --
>> ------------------------------------------
>> Roberto Iglesias
>> High Temperature Materials Project
>> Laboratory for Materials Behaviour
>> Nuclear Energy and Safety Department
>> OHLD/013
>> PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT
>> CH-5232 Villigen PSI
>> phone: +41 (0)56 310 54 81
>> fax:   +41 (0)56 310 35 65
>> e-mail: roberto.iglesias at psi.ch
>> Internet: www.psi.ch
>> -----------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wien mailing list
>> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
>> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>>
> 
> 


More information about the Wien mailing list