[Wien] Is it a bug in irrep?

Peter Blaha pblaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Wed Oct 25 08:18:41 CEST 2006


I agree it looks strange, but is probably a leftover from some testing.
I do not think it should be changed, but you may try it. However, for 
complex cases I'd expect that it gives wrong irreps.

> Dear all,
>  I found it maybe a tiny bug from line 50 of SRC_irrep/kptin.f,which reads
> that
> 
>       if(2.eq.1) then
>        DO 250 I=1,NV
>          A(I,NNE)=CONJG(A(I,NNE))
>          B(I,NNE)=CONJG(B(I,NNE))
> 250    CONTINUE
>        endif
> 
> For  2.eq.1 just only giving 'false',I think it should be
> if(FL(2).eq.FL(1)) then .......
> 
> I am using an old version of wien2k (03).
> 
> Best regards, Jun
> 


                                      P.Blaha
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-15671             FAX: +43-1-58801-15698
Email: blaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at    WWW: http://info.tuwien.ac.at/theochem/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------


More information about the Wien mailing list