[Wien] Is it a bug in irrep?
Peter Blaha
pblaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Wed Oct 25 08:18:41 CEST 2006
I agree it looks strange, but is probably a leftover from some testing.
I do not think it should be changed, but you may try it. However, for
complex cases I'd expect that it gives wrong irreps.
> Dear all,
> I found it maybe a tiny bug from line 50 of SRC_irrep/kptin.f,which reads
> that
>
> if(2.eq.1) then
> DO 250 I=1,NV
> A(I,NNE)=CONJG(A(I,NNE))
> B(I,NNE)=CONJG(B(I,NNE))
> 250 CONTINUE
> endif
>
> For 2.eq.1 just only giving 'false',I think it should be
> if(FL(2).eq.FL(1)) then .......
>
> I am using an old version of wien2k (03).
>
> Best regards, Jun
>
P.Blaha
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-15671 FAX: +43-1-58801-15698
Email: blaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at WWW: http://info.tuwien.ac.at/theochem/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Wien
mailing list