[Wien] IBZ Problem
Peter Blaha
pblaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Wed Apr 4 09:59:02 CEST 2007
Your figure is wrong. The k-points are given in hex. coordinates, where
a* and b* span an angle of 60 degrees.
Chiung-Yuan Lin schrieb:
> Dear all,
> I am calculating a 2D hexagonal lattice, and generate a klist (using
> kgen) as follows:
>
> 1 0 0 0 14 1.0 -7.0 1.5 400 k, div: ( 14 14 1)
> 2 0 1 0 14 6.0
> 3 0 2 0 14 6.0
> 4 0 3 0 14 6.0
> 5 0 4 0 14 6.0
> 6 0 5 0 14 6.0
> 7 0 6 0 14 6.0
> 8 0 7 0 14 3.0
> 9 1 1 0 14 6.0
> 10 1 2 0 14 12.0
> 11 1 3 0 14 12.0
> 12 1 4 0 14 12.0
> 13 1 5 0 14 12.0
> 14 1 6 0 14 12.0
> 15 2 2 0 14 6.0
> 16 2 3 0 14 12.0
> 17 2 4 0 14 12.0
> 18 2 5 0 14 12.0
> 19 2 6 0 14 6.0
> 20 3 3 0 14 6.0
> 21 3 4 0 14 12.0
> 22 3 5 0 14 12.0
> 23 4 4 0 14 6.0
> 24 4 5 0 14 6.0
> END
>
> I plot the those k points (blue), as well as the reciprocal lattice
> points (green) and the 1st Brillouin zone corners (red) in the
> attached file ibz.jpg. The area formed by the klist k points (blue)
> doesn't look like the IBZ at all. For example, some points seem to be
> related by reflection symmetry. can someone point out what's wrong
> with it? Or do I have a wrong idea about IBZ?
>
> Thanks,
> Chiung-Yuan
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
--
P.Blaha
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-15671 FAX: +43-1-58801-15698
Email: blaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at WWW:
http://info.tuwien.ac.at/theochem/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Wien
mailing list