[Wien] wien in parallel mode is slower than serial mode
nilton@ufba.br
nilton at ufba.br
Fri Dec 21 17:45:50 CET 2007
Dear Florent,
Yes, I did your previous remark and it not work! This is the reason
why I put that question again. And I sent one e-mail for your private
e-mail address before, explaining this point. Thanks for your
consideration and your wish to help me, but it is not enough to me. I
raised the matrix size of that system on more than 10 times and the
behavior is the same: lapw1 is faster, but lapw2 is very slower. If
lapw2 write on the disk, lapw1 also to. So, why could lapw1 be faster
and lapw2 not? This don't make sense. Also, the total time of the run
in parallel running is bigger than in serial running as you com see in
my prevous e-mail.
> My opinion is to use parallel calculations if you win something.
> Changing from 4hours to 1 hours by running on 4 nodes instead of 1 is
> efficient, but running on 15s instead of 60s... I am not sure it is and
> furthermore, I'm not sure it will justify the time that people will
> spend to answer your question.
I want not people stop yours job to answer my question, but I hope if
someone had experience this problem and wants help me I will appreciate.
Regards and merry Christmas
Nilton
>
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> | Florent BOUCHER | |
> | Institut des Matériaux Jean Rouxel | Mailto:Florent.Boucher at cnrs-imn.fr |
> | 2, rue de la Houssinière | Phone: (33) 2 40 37 39 24 |
> | BP 32229 | Fax: (33) 2 40 37 39 95 |
> | 44322 NANTES CEDEX 3 (FRANCE) | http://www.cnrs-imn.fr |
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
Universidade Federal da Bahia - http://www.portal.ufba.br
More information about the Wien
mailing list