[Wien] top, hollow and bridge interface calculations
morteza rafiee
m_rafiee_k at yahoo.com
Sun Feb 4 13:43:33 CET 2007
Dear users
I am performing interfaces calculations. I created symmetric substrate layers and deposited a mono layer on it within top, bridge and hollow sites configurations. Then I relaxed the slab for these three various states, i.e. top, bridge and hollow sites.
First I would report that I have found to be the total energy of the bridge site smaller than the other top and hollow sites. This is in the case that, unfortunately, our deposited atoms for the later case of bridge site are under pressure in both x and y directions as well as z direction, i.e. :FGLxxx and :FORxxx are nonzero for x, y and z directions. For the top and hollow sites, however, there are no forces in x and y directions. For these two cases, top and hollow sites, we have only, as expected, non zero forces in z direction.
Trying has been made to reach the stable configuration using relaxation. But we could not reach the zero forces in x and y directions for the case of bridge site.
Now our questions are:
Do we try to study bridge site at all? This question is raised due to the fact that we could not find zero forces for x and y direction even after relaxation. This itself indicates that most likely our atomic positions are not consistent with space group of the substrate.
For sure in the case of bridge site sgroup program also complain about the space group. We did not pay attention to the message of sgroup program, because we believe that we have already correctly created the structure.
If we do not, how we can explain the calculated smaller energy for the case of bridge site compared to the other cases.
We also, furthermore, do not know what criterion is for choosing an initial distance between our substrate and deposited layer. If we know the answer of this question, then we hope to be far away of local minimum to avoid trapping on it and also save relaxation time.
Our relaxations are still running, but we would below report at this stage our results.
Our forces and total energy after relaxation for the case of:
1) Top site
:FGL001: 1.ATOM 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.433000000
:FGL002: 2.ATOM 0.000000000 0.000000000 -3.354000000
:FGL003: 3.ATOM 0.000000000 0.000000000 -1.251000000
:FGL004: 4.ATOM 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.847000000
:FGL005: 5.ATOM 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.339000000
:FGL006: 6.ATOM 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.760000000
:FGL007: 7.ATOM 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.408000000
:FGL008: 8.ATOM 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.321000000
:FGL009: 9.ATOM 0.000000000 0.000000000 -5.245000000
:ENE : ********** TOTAL ENERGY IN Ry = -92995.521365
2) Hollow site
:FGL001: 1.ATOM 0.000000000 0.000000000 -1.725000000
:FGL002: 2.ATOM 0.000000000 0.000000000 3.962000000
:FGL003: 3.ATOM 0.000000000 0.000000000 -0.246000000
:FGL004: 4.ATOM 0.000000000 0.000000000 -7.898000000
:FGL005: 5.ATOM 0.000000000 0.000000000 -0.219000000
:FGL006: 6.ATOM 0.000000000 0.000000000 -0.190000000
:FGL007: 7.ATOM 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.893000000
:FGL008: 8.ATOM 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.458000000
:FGL009: 9.ATOM 0.000000000 0.000000000 3.963000000
:ENE : ********** TOTAL ENERGY IN Ry = -92995.561715
3) Bridge site
:FGL001: 1.ATOM -4.488321022 4.488320993 1.420000000
:FGL002: 2.ATOM 4.624575687 -4.624575656 0.037000000
:FGL003: 3.ATOM 0.174937133 -0.174937132 -1.701000000
:FGL004: 4.ATOM 0.092376044 -0.092376043 -1.618000000
:FGL005: 5.ATOM -0.034641016 0.034641016 -2.211000000
:FGL006: 6.ATOM -0.012701706 0.012701706 -0.588000000
:FGL007: 7.ATOM 0.076210236 -0.076210236 0.359000000
:FGL008: 8.ATOM -0.048497423 0.048497423 0.270000000
:FGL009: 9.ATOM -0.386247333 0.386247330 0.792000000
:ENE : ********** TOTAL ENERGY IN Ry = -92995.657796
I will be thankful to every body that helps me.
Morteza Rafiee
---------------------------------
Be a PS3 game guru.
Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20070204/30e5e500/attachment.html
More information about the Wien
mailing list