[Wien] Questions to BoltzTraP
Steven Dixon
stevendixonmail at yahoo.com
Mon Jan 22 09:58:07 CET 2007
Dear Madsen,
Thank you for your offering the code of BoltzTraP. I am
a new user of BoltzTraP, I have two questions about it:
No. 1 I use BoltzTraP to calculate the Seebeck coefficient of
a binary compound. The n-type Seebeck coefficient
coincide with the experimental results at the
appropriate experimental range of carrier concentration,
but the p-typ Seebeck value is larger than the experimental
results at about 100 uV/K in the whole effective carrier
concentration. I also test the LPFAC, I found that I got the
same Seebeck coefficient if I set LPFAC=5 and 30. The
conduction band of my sample is similar with the parabolic
band but the valence band is not the parabolic band, can we
get the Seebeck coefficient that is similar with the
experimental result only from parabolic band structure? Are
there other reasons of the difference between the
computed and experimental Seebeck coefficient?
No.2 In the paper of Computer Physics Communications 175
(2006) 6771, you listed the picture of integrand factor
∂f/∂ε, (ε-μ) ∂f/∂ε, (ε-μ) 2∂f/∂ε. How can I get these values from
the BoltzTraP code?
Thanks in advance
Best wishes
Steven Dixon
---------------------------------
8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time
with theYahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20070122/423c0df5/attachment.html
More information about the Wien
mailing list