[Wien] case.ineece when MULT > 1
Patrick Nash
Patrick.Nash at utsa.edu
Fri Mar 9 19:40:28 CET 2007
Hi,
I am using WIEN2k ver. 7-2 and am studying the material
Pr Ba Co2 O5.5;
I have a question regarding the correct input for the "case.ineece"
file
[which is documented in the UG in
Section 2.4.5.7 Exact-exchange and Hybrid functionals for correlated
electrons]
In my "case.struct" file I have an entry for Pr that is of MULT= 2
ATOM -7: X=0.50000000 Y=0.25000000 Z=0.50000000
MULT= 2 ISPLIT= 8
-7: X=0.50000000 Y=0.75000000 Z=0.50000000
Pr7 NPT= 781 R0=0.00001000 RMT= 2.4800 Z: 59.0
LOCAL ROT MATRIX: 0.0000000 1.0000000 0.0000000
0.0000000 0.0000000 1.0000000
1.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000
In my "case.ineece" file I have an entry
7 1 3 Pr atom index, nlorb, lorb
where
iatom
is the index of atom in struct file
nlorb
is the number of orbital moments for which exact exchange shall be
calculated
lorb
= orbital numbers (repeated nlorb-times)
To account for MULT=2 I simply duplicated this entry on the next line of
my "case.ineece" file.
I handled cobalt's 3-d entry similarly; "case.struct" contains
ATOM -9: X=0.00000000 Y=0.50000000 Z=0.25000000
MULT= 2 ISPLIT= 8
-9: X=0.00000000 Y=0.50000000 Z=0.75000000
Co9 NPT= 781 R0=0.00005000 RMT= 1.8300 Z: 27.0
LOCAL ROT MATRIX: 1.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000
0.0000000 1.0000000 0.0000000
0.0000000 0.0000000 1.0000000
ATOM -10: X=0.00000000 Y=0.00000000 Z=0.25000000
MULT= 2 ISPLIT= 8
-10: X=0.00000000 Y=0.00000000 Z=0.75000000
Co10 NPT= 781 R0=0.00005000 RMT= 1.8300 Z: 27.0
LOCAL ROT MATRIX: 1.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000
0.0000000 1.0000000 0.0000000
0.0000000 0.0000000 1.0000000
and hence my final "case.ineece" file reads
------------------ top of file: case.ineece -----------
-9.0 6 emin, natorb
9 1 2 Co-atom index, nlorb, lorb
9 1 2 Co-atom index, nlorb, lorb
10 1 2 Co-atom index, nlorb, lorb
10 1 2 Co-atom index, nlorb, lorb
7 1 3 Pr-atom index, nlorb, lorb
7 1 3 Pr-atom index, nlorb, lorb
EECE HYBR / EECE mode
1.0 fraction of exact exchange
------------------ bottom of file ---------------------
My calculation converges after about 70 iterations, but I doubt that I
have actually set things up correctly. Can anyone please tell me the
correct way to include an atom whose MULT > 1 in the "case.ineece" file?
[I have tried giving all of the atoms in Pr2 Ba2 Co4 O11 unique names
(and hence indices), but this seems to give rise to equivalency errors
later in the calculation.]
Thanks in advance.
Patrick Nash
Professor of Physics
Department of Physics and Astronomy
The University of Texas at San Antonio
Patrick.Nash at utsa.edu <mailto:Patrick.NaPatrick.Nash at utsa.edu>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20070309/cd149dc2/attachment.html
More information about the Wien
mailing list