[Wien] Old Wien

[Robertson Burgess]

Dear All,

Many thanks for your many replies to my request. I will compile them,
and let you all know the results.

Bob Burgess
University of Newcastle

>>> Stefaan Cottenier <Stefaan.Cottenier at fys.kuleuven.be> 05/24/07 5:29
PM >>>

Not cleaning up download directories very often is a bad habit, but 
sometimes useful. I found WIEN2k_03.tar (downloaded April 2004) and 
WIEN2k_02.tar (downloaded september 2002) on my pc. About 13 Mb each, 
can you send an ftp address to my private mail where I can put them?

Stefaan



Robertson Burgess wrote:

>Respected Wien users,
>
>I am terribly sorry to do this, but I posted about a week ago, asking
if
>anyone had the source code for WIEN2k_03. I require this old version
>since we created very interesting and promising results using this
>version, and have been unable to replicate these results with more
>recent versions of WIEN, going back to WIEN2k_05.4. If anyone could
>please send me the old source code, I'd be very appreciative.
>Below I've attached a copy of my previous post. I received two replies,
>one being an empty direct post to me, and the other actually being a
>question unrelated to my original post.
>Once again, I'm sorry to repost a question like this, but I really have
>no other ability to move forward.
>
>Many Thanks
>Bob Burgess
>University of Newcastle
>
>My original post,
>
>Dear Wien Users,
>I'm modelling the optical properties for slabs of Aluminium of varying
>thicknesses and vacuum gap. I have posted previously and was informed
of
>errors in more recent version of JOINT and given error-free versions. I
>am still unable to reproduce results that were calculated quite a while
>ago, results that matched with our expectations. I have tried to
>reproduce these results using versions of WIEN as far back as 5.4 and
>have been unable to.
>I am not sure how old the version of WIEN is that we used originally,
>but looking through the data files we have shows files dating back to
>December 2003, and we don't think that it was updated until quite
>recently, so these initial calculations probably date back to a version
>of WIEN current at the end of December 2003.
>To allow me to attempt to reproduce these original results to check the
>validity of them, could someone please send me the source code for the
>appropriate version of WIEN?
>
>Many thanks,
>Bob Burgess
>University of Newcastle
>_______________________________________________
>Wien mailing list
>Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
>http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>
>  
>


Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm

_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien