[Wien] Non reproducibility of previous results: spin-orbit/orbital polarization
ROBERTO LUIS IGLESIAS PASTRANA
roberto at uniovi.es
Fri Dec 19 11:18:14 CET 2008
Dear all
While trying to reproduce some old tests for the bcc Fe system I bumped into a problem. Before I was using Wien2k_06.4 and now I'm using the latest Wien2k_08.3 release. I tried with exactly the same input files which, in a few cases, meant going back to slightly slower mixing schemes (BROYD instead of MSEC1 in case.inm) and with the new and improved ones as well. In a normal spin-polarized calculation there is no problem. However, when spin-orbit coupling and orbital polarization correction in case.inorb is added, I get different results. After executing initso_lapw, and running dstart, dstart up/dn again, the number of plane waves in case.outputd increases from 112 to 286. The case.inso file reads:
WFFIL
4 1 0 llmax,ipr,kpot
-10.0000 7.00000 emin,emax (output energy window)
0. 0. 1. direction of magnetization (lattice vectors)
0 number of atoms for which RLO is added
0 0 0 0 0 number of atoms for which SO is switch off; atoms
Subsequently, I ran
runsp_lapw -so -cc 0.0001 ec 0.00001
save_lapw -d SOC
I build the right case.inorb
2 1 0 nmod, natorb, ipr
PRATT 1.0 BROYD/PRATT, mixing
1 1 2 iatom nlorb, lorb
1 nmdep
1 Ncalc
0. 0. 1. direction of M
and case.indmc
-10. Emin cutoff energy
1 number of atoms for which density matrix is calculated
1 1 2 index of 1st atom, number of L's, L1
0 0 r-index, (l,s)index
And
runsp_lapw -orb -so -cc 0.0001 -ec 0.00001
I'm not able to reproduce the original results, specially regarding the orbital moment, which is now:
:ORB001: ORBITAL MOMENT: 0.00000 0.00000 0.06208 PROJECTION ON M 0.06209
and used to be:
:ORB001: ORBITAL MOMENT: 0.00000 0.00000 0.07793 PROJECTION ON M 0.07793
Now, were there any significant changes in lapwdm or orb between these two Wien2k versions? I found some updates in the web page, of course, but I don't know if they would be significant as to change the orbital moment as much as a 20%.
One thing I noticed is that case.in0 has changed the last line from
18 18 18 2.00 min IFFT-parameters, enhancement factor
to
24 24 24 2.00 min IFFT-parameters, enhancement factor
Please excuse my ignorance, but I don't know if this is relevant or not. I'm using option 13 (PBE) for the XC potential.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions and merry X-mas to you all!
Roberto
More information about the Wien
mailing list