[Wien] optical properties
ali hamidani
hamidani.ali at gmail.com
Mon Feb 4 23:43:50 CET 2008
Dear wien users,
I'm using wien2k to calculate the Kerr angles in a material and I had a
problem with sigmaxx. So I tried to reproduce the results which are given in
the reference '' Jianqiu Cai et al. journal of magnetism and magnetic
materials 292 (2005) 476-482'' but I couldn't, I found the Imaginary part of
sigmaxx always positive Knowing that I was used the Following procedure;
runsp_lapw -so
x kgen -so (cp /case.struct /case.ksym)
runsp_lapw -so -s lapw1 -e lcore
x opticc -so -up/dn
x joint -so -up/dn
(run x joint with switch 6 for obtained plasma frequencies and I run with
switch 4)
x kram -so -up/dn
Co2TiSn.inop--------------------
1063 1 number of k-points, first k-point
-6.0 2.0 Emin, Emax for matrix elements
2 number of choices (columns in *outmat) - 0: MME into case.mme
1 Re xx
7 Im xy
OFF ON/OFF writes MME to unit 4
Co2TiSn.injoint---------------------
1 70 42 : LOWER,UPPER and (optional) UPPER-VAL BANDINDEX
0.0000 0.00100 2.0000 : EMIN DE EMAX FOR ENERGYGRID IN ryd
eV : output units eV / ryd / cm-1
4 : SWITCH
2 : NUMBER OF COLUMNS
0.1 0.1 0.3 : BROADENING (FOR DRUDE MODEL - switch 6,7)
Co2TiSn.inkram-------------------
0.1 Gamma: broadening of interband spectrum
0.0 energy shift (scissors operator)
1 add intraband contributions? yes/no: 1/0
8.709 8.709 plasma frequencies (from joint, opt 6)
0.06 0.06 Gammas for Drude terms
Can someone tell me where I am wrong?
I will appreciate too much the help.
A. Hamidani
University of Guelma, Algeria
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20080204/22c05fd2/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Wien
mailing list