[Wien] runsp_lapw following afm_lapw

[Stefaan Cottenier]

This is only because runafm is not guaranteed to be always correct (not
yet detected bugs etc.). To be safe, you should therefor continue
afterwards with a few iterations using runsp. If runafm was correct for
your case, nothing will change. If there was a bug (or if the material
wants to be ferrimagnetic rather than antiferromagnetic) you will see
changes.

Stefaan

Wenmei wrote:
> Dear Wien2k users,
> recently, I have done some AFM calculations, but I have somewhat confused
> by the recommedation below from the Wien2k userguide
> " It is recommended that you save your work(lapw_save) and check the
> results by continuing with a regular runsp_lapw. If nothing
> changes(E-tot and other properties),then you are ok."
> why E-tot and other properties should not change by continuting a
> regular runsp_lapw? if it is truely so, will it be conclude that the
> final converged result has dependence of the initial given condition,
> not uniquely determined???
> Any suggestion will be greatly appreciated!
> Best regards,
> Iphyboy
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 雅虎邮箱传递新年祝福，个性贺卡送亲朋！
> <http://cn.mail.yahoo.com/gc/index.html?entry=5&souce=mail_mailletter_tagline>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>   


Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm