[Wien] Antiferromagnetic Calculation With Orbital Potentials
David Tompsett
dat36 at cam.ac.uk
Wed May 13 11:34:16 CEST 2009
Thank you Pavel and Stefaan for your help.
I have one more question about analysing the output from the found
ground state.
I wish to know the effective moment for the ion. How do I combine the
orbital moment (as projected along the chosen magnetization direction
for SO coupling) and spin moments?
Thank you,
David.
Pavel Novak wrote:
> Dear David,
>
> I believe that two solutions you obtained just reflect the fact that with
> very localized 4f states multiple solutions may be obtained, especially
> when applying the orbital potentials. Criterion for the ground state is
> the lowest total energy.
>
> Regards
> Pavel
>
> On Tue, 12 May 2009, David Tompsett wrote:
>
>
>> Dear All,
>> I am studying the magnetic ground state of a metallic
>> system. The magnetic atoms are Yb, and I am localizing the 4f moment
>> using an orbital potential, as well as applying spin-orbit coupling.
>>
>> I have a question about the behaviour of the spin moments depending on
>> my input to case.inst
>> Firstly, I set the starting spins such that the 5d electron and 4f hole
>> have a net spin and are flipped between the two Yb atoms:
>> Yb
>> Xe 4
>> 4, 3,3.0 N
>> 4, 3,3.0 N
>> 4,-4,4.0 N
>> 4,-4,3.0 N
>> 5, 2,1.0 N
>> 5, 2,0.0 N
>> 6,-1,1.0 N
>> 6,-1,1.0 N
>>
>> Yb2
>> Xe 4
>> 4, 3,3.0 N
>> 4, 3,3.0 N
>> 4,-4,3.0 N
>> 4,-4,4.0 N
>> 5, 2,0.0 N
>> 5, 2,1.0 N
>> 6,-1,1.0 N
>> 6,-1,1.0 N
>> In this case the moments between the two Yb atoms go towards spin
>> moments of +2u and -1u during the convergence. Not an antiferromagnetic
>> solution.
>>
>> Second, I set the 6s spin to 0.5 up and 0.5 down( ie. not net spin) in
>> case.inst:
>> Yb
>> Xe 4
>> 4, 3,3.0 N
>> 4, 3,3.0 N
>> 4,-4,4.0 N
>> 4,-4,3.0 N
>> 5, 2,0.5 N
>> 5, 2,0.5 N
>> 6,-1,1.0 N
>> 6,-1,1.0 N
>>
>> Yb2
>> Xe 4
>> 4, 3,3.0 N
>> 4, 3,3.0 N
>> 4,-4,3.0 N
>> 4,-4,4.0 N
>> 5, 2,0.5 N
>> 5, 2,0.5 N
>> 6,-1,1.0 N
>> 6,-1,1.0 N
>> Then, a stable antiferromagnetic solution was found.
>>
>> Questions:
>> 1) Does the different behaviour occur because I am only applying my
>> orbital potential to the 4f states and not 5d?
>>
>> 2) Is there some other physics to explain this? Is there something that
>> I can check to diagnose the behaviour in the first case?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> David.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
David A. Tompsett
Quantum Matter Group
Cavendish Laboratory
J. J. Thomson Avenue
Cambridge CB3 0HE
U.K.
Tel: +44 7907 566351 (mobile)
Fax: +44 1223 768140
http://www-qm.phy.cam.ac.uk/
More information about the Wien
mailing list