[Wien] Converging Gmax
David Tompsett
dat36 at cam.ac.uk
Mon Oct 26 12:14:43 CET 2009
Dear All,
I have a query about converging energies with respect to Gmax. I am
working on a d-metal metallic system.
I have been attempting to converge the difference in total energy
between a non-magnetic and antiferromagnetic spin configuration. The
calculation is done with the GGA using RKmax=9 and RMT's of 2.1 and
8000Kpt in the full Brillouin zone.
With these parameters (which I tested for convergence) I have then tried
to converge the energy difference with respect to Gmax and found some
behaviour that I can not understand. All calculations were converged
with -ec 0.00001.
For the non-magnetic calculation the energies go as:
Gmax Energy
12 -28765.981815
14 -28765.984603
16 -28765.983740
18 -28765.983085
20 -28765.982506
22 -28765.982092
24 -28765.981842
26 -28765.981561
So this indicates large changes of order of 0.01Ry as Gmax is changed.
This seems like an extraordinarily high Gmax for convergence
In contrast for the antiferromagnetic calculation we find little
variation as we change Gmax:
Gmax Energy
12 -28765.982610
14 -28765.982595
18 -28765.982645
26 -28765.982645
From this I have a few questions:
1) Why would a non-magnetic calculation take such a larger Gmax to
converge? Is Gmax=26 reasonable?
2) Why might the convergence of the AFM calculation be much faster in Gmax?
3) When converging Gmax is it acceptable to reuse the charge density
(*.clm*) files from the previous calculation? ie. should I run dstart
again before each new value of Gmax?
Thank you for any help,
David.
--
David A. Tompsett
Quantum Matter Group
Cavendish Laboratory
J. J. Thomson Avenue
Cambridge CB3 0HE
U.K.
Tel: +44 7907 566351 (mobile)
Fax: +44 1223 768140
http://www-qm.phy.cam.ac.uk/
More information about the Wien
mailing list