[Wien] Force calculations: a problem with Bi
Stefaan Cottenier
stefaan.cottenier at ugent.be
Wed Feb 17 21:45:36 CET 2010
Two simple things to check first (maybe too simple):
* Do you have FOR (instead of TOT) in case.in2(c) in the last
iteration? Otherwise Pulay corrections are not taken into account, and
that might explain your observations.
* Do you use spin-orbit coupling? Forces in wien2k are not consistent
with spin-orbit.
Stefaan
Citeren mazin <mazin at nrl.navy.mil>:
> I am calculating a Bi-containing compound, BiOCuS. It has a rather
> simple tetragonal structure with two free parameters, Bi (z) and S
> (z).
>
> When I vary Bi(z) keeping everything else fixed I obtain a well
> defined total energy minimum at one z, and a well defined Bu force
> zero at another z. Both sets of calculations are well converged,
> k-mesh convergence, RKmax, GKmax, fft, linearization parameters, rMT
> dependences etc are all tested. Including more semicores states does
> not affect the results either. A closer inspection shows that the
> force obtain by taking the derivative of the total energy agrees
> well with the calculated forces, if the latter are shifted by 63
> mRy/bohr (a huge number). The calculations are nonmagnetic and
> scalar relativistic.
>
> I vaguely remember having some problems quite some time ago with
> force calculations for another Bi compound, but at that time I never
> got to the bottom of that.
>
> I wonder if this is a known problem and if anybody stumbled upon it before.
>
> I.M.
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>
--
Stefaan Cottenier
Center for Molecular Modeling (CMM)
Ghent University
Technologiepark 903 (2nd floor)
BE-9052 ZWIJNAARDE
Belgium
http://molmod.Ugent.be
email: Stefaan.Cottenier /at/ UGent.be
More information about the Wien
mailing list