[Wien] [Wien2k Users] Global Energy parameter
Ghosh SUDDHASATTWA
ssghosh at igcar.gov.in
Wed Jan 27 14:39:22 CET 2010
Hi Stefaan,
I hope you remember that you gave the suggestion of changing the energy
parameter from 0.90 to 1.3. (my earlier mail on some errors)
After you suggested that, I have kept the energy parameter for d and f
orbitals as 1.30 (1.20 also is quite a good value, the ENE increases only
slightly).
The default value of 0.30 does not seem to work.
So I changed it.
Suddhasattwa
-----Original Message-----
From: wien-bounces at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
[mailto:wien-bounces at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at] On Behalf Of Stefaan
Cottenier
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 6:57 PM
To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Subject: Re: [Wien] [Wien2k Users] Global Energy parameter
> In which case the energy parameter is different for d and f orbitals?
In those cases where you do have valence f-electrons, or when the
f-states are only slightly above E_fermi.
> If they are kept same and that is what I usually do,
Don't make such decisions yourself, unless you have a good reason to do
so. You can rely on what is given in the in1 file that is generated for you.
> then what would be
> the implication of having it different in the .in1 file for d and f
> orbitals?
In many cases, the only difference will be that your total energy is a
bit higher than it should be (I think).
Stefaan
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
More information about the Wien
mailing list