[Wien] help required
Rocquefelte
Xavier.Rocquefelte at cnrs-imn.fr
Sat Apr 7 13:48:33 CEST 2012
I have difficulties to follow your arguments. In your first email you
have mentioned that you did non spin polarized calculations, and now you
are speaking about ferromagnetic character at M point!
In addition, I do not understand the following line: "DOS and band
structre showing totally opposite behaviour".
My feeling remains the same and particularly in the present case. You
are looking at graphene, a 2D system for which the band dispersion is
large.
You must see Van't Hoff singularities in the DOS and you need to have a
dense k-mesh to have a well-converged DOS.
Did you check the convergency of your DOS calculation but using denser
k-meshes?
Regards
Xavier
On 04/07/2012 12:45 PM, arqum hashmi wrote:
> Thanks Sir Xavier,
> but the problem is this that both DOS and band structre showing
> totally opposite behaviour.
> my system is graphene with some doping of Boron nitride.
> DOS is good as we expect but band structure shows really strange
> behaviour. graphene has zero bandgap in brillioun zone at K point and
> when i used graphene with BN, we obtain some ferromagnetic at M point
> when we plot band structure.
> i don't know whats wrong with band structure.
> Best Regrads
> Arqum Hashmi
>
> *From:* Rocquefelte <Xavier.Rocquefelte at cnrs-imn.fr>
> *To:* A Mailing list for WIEN2k users <wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
> *Sent:* Saturday, April 7, 2012 7:02 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Wien] help required
>
> The band gap estimated from the DOS is always larger than the one
> extracted from the band structure (which is more accurate).
> To estimate the fundamental band gap you should consider the one
> deduced from the band structure.
>
> The difference you observed is certainly due to the existence of a
> broad band which has a very low density near the Fermi energy. As a
> consequence, you can have the feeling that you have a gap by looking
> at the DOS.
>
> Could you give more details about your calculations ? Which system ?
> The value of the band gap from the DOS ?
>
> Regards
>
> Xavier
>
>
> On 04/07/2012 07:41 AM, arqum hashmi wrote:
>> Dear Wien2k Users
>>
>> I am doing non spin polarized calculation. In this calculation, DOS
>> and Band structure are not consistent with each other. DOS shows that
>> it has some band gap but in band structure it shows that it is
>> metallic. I don't know what is the problem in this and why DOS and
>> Band structure is inconsistent with each other.
>> i expect that DOS is correct but something is wrong with band structure.
>> If any one of you give any suggestion that how i can solve this
>> problem. I will be very thankful to you.
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Arqum Hashmi
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wien mailing list
>> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at <mailto:Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
>> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at <mailto:Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120407/5d08bfe8/attachment.htm>
More information about the Wien
mailing list