[Wien] help required

[arqum hashmi]

Thanks Sir Xavier
i will do it then tell you.
 
Best Regards
Arqum Hashmi
 

________________________________
 From: Rocquefelte <Xavier.Rocquefelte at cnrs-imn.fr>
To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users <wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at> 
Sent: Sunday, April 8, 2012 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Wien] help required
  

  
For the convergency of the DOS you simply have to plot the DOS for different k-meshes (increasing progressively the number of k-points) and when the DOS stops to evolve then you are converged. 

Regards

Xavier


On 04/07/2012 03:29 PM, arqum hashmi wrote: 
Thanks a lot sir Xavier, 
>Before this i also thinked about this that  i don't have denser k mesh thats why i didn't get correct results. 
>yeah thats why i am saying to you that band structure giving very unnatural behaviour.  Sorry not ferromagnetic you can say that conductor behaviour because band lines crossing fermi level. 
>opposite behaviour means DOS showing bandgap but band structure showing conducting behaviour. 
>  
>how can i check the convergency of my DOS calculation. 
>  
>i am really worried about this. 
>Best Regards 
>Arqum Hashmi 
>  
>  
>
> 
>From: Rocquefelte <Xavier.Rocquefelte at cnrs-imn.fr>
>To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users <wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at> 
>Sent: Saturday, April 7, 2012 8:48 PM
>Subject: Re: [Wien] help required
>  
>
>I have difficulties to follow your arguments. In your first email you have mentioned that you did non spin polarized calculations, and now you are speaking about ferromagnetic character at M point! 
>
>In addition, I do not understand the following line: "DOS and band structre showing totally opposite behaviour". 
>
>My feeling remains the same and particularly in the
                  present case. You are looking at graphene, a 2D system
                  for which the band dispersion is large. 
>You must see Van't Hoff singularities in the DOS and
                  you need to have a dense k-mesh to have a
                  well-converged DOS. 
>Did you check the convergency of your DOS calculation
                  but using denser k-meshes? 
>
>Regards
>
>Xavier
>
>
>
>
>On 04/07/2012 12:45 PM, arqum hashmi wrote: 
>Thanks Sir Xavier,  
>>but the problem is this that both DOS and band structre showing totally opposite behaviour. 
>>my system is graphene with some doping of Boron nitride. 
>>DOS is good as we expect but band structure shows really strange behaviour. graphene  has zero bandgap in brillioun zone at K point and when i used graphene with BN, we obtain some ferromagnetic at M point when we plot band structure. 
>>  
>>i don't know whats wrong with band structure. 
>>  
>>Best Regrads 
>>Arqum Hashmi 
>>
>> 
>>From: Rocquefelte <Xavier.Rocquefelte at cnrs-imn.fr>
>>To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users <wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at> 
>>Sent: Saturday, April 7, 2012 7:02 PM
>>Subject: Re: [Wien] help required
>>  
>>
>> 
>>The band gap estimated from the DOS is always larger than the one extracted from the band structure (which is more accurate). 
>>To estimate the fundamental band gap you
                            should consider the one deduced from the
                            band structure. 
>>
>>The difference you observed is certainly due
                            to the existence of a broad band which has a
                            very low density near the Fermi energy. As a
                            consequence, you can have the feeling that
                            you have a gap by looking at the DOS. 
>>
>>Could you give more details about your
                            calculations ? Which system ? The value of
                            the band gap from the DOS ? 
>>
>>Regards
>>
>>Xavier
>>
>>
>>On 04/07/2012 07:41 AM, arqum hashmi wrote: 
>>Dear Wien2k Users 
>>>
>>> 
>>>I am doing non spin polarized calculation. In this calculation, DOS and Band structure are not consistent with each other. DOS shows that it has some band gap but in band structure it shows that it is metallic. I don't know what is the problem in this and why DOS and Band structure is inconsistent with each other. 
>>>i expect that DOS is correct but something is wrong with band structure.
>>> 
>>>If any one of you give any suggestion that how i can solve this problem. I will be very thankful to you. 
>>>
>>> 
>>>Best Regards 
>>>Arqum Hashmi
>>>  
>>>
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien   
>>  
>>_______________________________________________
>>Wien mailing list
>>Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
>>http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>>
>>
>>   
>>
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien   
>  
>_______________________________________________
>Wien mailing list
>Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
>http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>
>
>   
>
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien   
 
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120408/e1d52876/attachment.htm>