[Wien] (no subject)

Rocquefelte Xavier.Rocquefelte at cnrs-imn.fr
Wed Apr 18 13:41:35 CEST 2012


I didn't look in detail your email but here is the solution.

You should use the following case.indm file:

--------------------------
-9.                      Emin cutoff energy
  2                       number of atoms for which density matrix is 
calculated
  4 1  2      index of 1st atom, number of L's, L1
  5 1  2      dtto for 2nd atom, repeat NATOM times
  0 0           r-index, (l,s)index
--------------------------

and case.inorb file:

--------------------------
   1  2  0                     nmod, natorb, ipr
PRATT  1.0                    BROYD/PRATT, mixing
   4 1 2                          iatom nlorb, lorb
   5 1 2                         iatom nlorb, lorb
   1                              nsic 0..AFM, 1..SIC, 2..HFM
    0.1471 0.036        U J (Ry)   Note: we recommend to use U_eff = U-J 
and J=0
    0.1471 0.036        U J
--------------------------

To explain, let's take an example:

  4 1  2      index of 1st atom, number of L's, L1

Here you are saying that you will add a Hubbard term for atom 4, and 
only for one l-value, which is l = 2.
This treatment will be applied to the valence state of Pt, i.e. the 5d 
orbital of Pt. You should not specify the principal quantum number in 
this file (n-value).

I hope this reply will clarify the situation.

Regards

Xavier

P.S.1: It is recommended to use a Ueff value, i.e. Ueff = U -J.
In you case it will correspond to the following case.inorb file:


--------------------------
   1  2  0                     nmod, natorb, ipr
PRATT  1.0                    BROYD/PRATT, mixing
   4 1 2                          iatom nlorb, lorb
   5 1 2                         iatom nlorb, lorb
   1                              nsic 0..AFM, 1..SIC, 2..HFM
    0.1435 0.000        U J (Ry)   Note: we recommend to use U_eff = U-J 
and J=0
    0.1435 0.000        U J
--------------------------

P.S.2: The Hubbard term you are using is quite small (2eV). Is it what 
you really need for your system?




On 04/18/2012 01:14 PM, Madhav Ghimire wrote:
> Dear Dr. Xavier and wien users,
>     Thank you for your kind concern to my problem. Sorry for the 
> incomplete information. Let me complete my few queries and cases over 
> which I am concerned to:
> (i) I am having one oxide compound with the presence of Pt atoms 
> having 5d states. Because of this, I want to implement U. For the said 
> case, we require case.indm and case.inorb as suggested in userguide. 
> My edited case.indm file is as shown below
> -9.                      Emin cutoff energy
>  2                       number of atoms for which density matrix is 
> calculated
>  4 2  5      index of 1st atom, number of L's, L1
>  5 2  5      dtto for 2nd atom, repeat NATOM times
>  0 0           r-index, (l,s)index
> In this indm file (marked with red color), I could not understand how 
> L's=1 and , L1=2 is taken in userguide. From the the userguide, L's 
> corresponds to number of l-values for which the density matrix should 
> be calculated and L1 is the l-values for which the density matrix 
> should be calculated.
> For the case of Pt which is 5d atom it has l=2 and n=5 with d=5 
> sublevels. Hence I substituted as shown above. But, I did not 
> understand whether L's must be 2 or 5. Similar is for the case of L1. 
> And, what about the r-index.
> (ii) For case.inorb, below is the input value I tried to use
>   1  2  0                     nmod, natorb, ipr
> PRATT  1.0                    BROYD/PRATT, mixing
>   1 2 5                          iatom nlorb, lorb
>   2 2 5                          iatom nlorb, lorb
>   1                              nsic 0..AFM, 1..SIC, 2..HFM
>    0.1471 0.036        U J (Ry)   Note: we recommend to use U_eff = 
> U-J and J=0
>    0.1471 0.036        U J
> As in case.indm, I have similar type of problem. As mentioned in 
> userguide,
> nlorb; number of orbital moments for which exact exchange shall be 
> calculated
> lorb: orbital numbers .
> Here, I could not differentiate between the number of orbital moments 
> and orbital numbers. Does it mean the same or they are different.
> Could you kindly help to correct this two files.
> (iii) Can we fix the orbital moment of Pt.
> (iv) Can we set the minimum energy to more than 400 eV as the ground 
> state energy of oxygen is approx. 400 eV.
>
> Thank you in advance
> M. P. Ghimire
> NIMS, Japan
>
> 2012/4/18 Rocquefelte <Xavier.Rocquefelte at cnrs-imn.fr 
> <mailto:Xavier.Rocquefelte at cnrs-imn.fr>>
>
>     It seems that your message is incomplete.
>     However, I am surprized to see nlorb = 5!
>
>     If you are interested in "d" orbitals, nlorb should be 2, and if
>     it is "f" orbitals, nlorb should be 3.
>
>     Best Regards
>
>     Xavier
>
>
>
>
>
>     On 04/18/2012 09:26 AM, Madhav Ghimire wrote:
>>
>>     Dear wien2k users,
>>         I am facing some problems in putting the value of n     nlorb
>>     and lorb as provided in userguide.
>>     -9.                      Emin cutoff energy
>>      2                       number of atoms for which density matrix
>>     is calculated
>>      4  2  5      index of 1st atom, number of L's, L1
>>      5  2  5      dtto for 2nd atom, repeat NATOM times
>>      0 0           r-index, (l,s)index
>>     for
>>     -- 
>>     M. P. Ghimire
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Wien mailing list
>>     Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at  <mailto:Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
>>     http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Wien mailing list
>     Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
>     <mailto:Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
>     http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> M. P. Ghimire
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120418/53ab522d/attachment.htm>


More information about the Wien mailing list