[Wien] (no subject)
Rocquefelte
Xavier.Rocquefelte at cnrs-imn.fr
Wed Apr 18 17:10:59 CEST 2012
You provide very poor information concerning your calculation. As a
consequence it appears difficult to help you.
I can simply say that if you have used a supercell 2a x 2b x c, then a'
= 2a = 7.18 A° at the beginning.
If after the geometry optimization you have obtained a' = 7.5 A°, it
means that a' is overestimated by about 4.4%.
We expect an overestimation of the cell parameters from GGA, and
underestimation from LDA. I imagine that you have selected GGA for your
geometry optimization.
Concerning the experimental value a = 3.59 A°, i.e. a' = 2a = 7.18 A°,
is it the dimension of the alloy or the dimension related to a pure
phase (neglecting the impact of the substituent elements)?
Regards
Xavier
On 04/18/2012 05:03 PM, ben amara imen wrote:
> Hello!
> i'm trying to use supercell in order to determine electronic structure
> for ternary alloy.
> When i have generated 2*2*1 supercell , i have noted that the new
> lattices parameters (a,b,c) are very large camparatively with the
> starting lattices parameters
> for exp: a=3.59 A° , with supercell, a will be 7.5A° !!!!
> Also i do the optimization BUT the value still large
> It's normal and correct what i have found , if not what's the problem???
> can you help me please and thanks in advance
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120418/b408a51b/attachment.htm>
More information about the Wien
mailing list