[Wien] resolution dependent F(HKL)s from lapw3
Georg Eickerling
georg.eickerling at physik.uni-augsburg.de
Wed Aug 22 18:32:18 CEST 2012
Dear WIEN users,
I noticed a strange behavior of lapw3 which I do not understand:
Take for example a simple diamond case and calculate structure
factors from clmsum, lets say up to sin theta/lambda = 1.0:
0 0 0 0.0000000 12.0000251726
-1 -1 -1 0.2427814 -4.6536716863
0 0 -2 0.2803398 0.0000000000
0 -2 -2 0.3964603 -3.9459734623
-1 -1 -3 0.4648909 -2.3988162763
-2 -2 -2 0.4855627 0.2266152403
0 0 -4 0.5606796 -3.1297582248
-1 -3 -3 0.6109864 2.2069300710
0 -2 -4 0.6268588 0.0000000000
-2 -2 -4 0.6866894 2.8777607788
-3 -3 -3 0.7283441 1.9393120414
-1 -1 -5 0.7283441 1.9663566686
0 -4 -4 0.7929206 2.6458269883
-1 -3 -5 0.8292562 1.8056937118
-2 -4 -4 0.8410193 -0.0171687161
0 0 -6 0.8410193 0.0000000000
0 -2 -6 0.8865122 2.4363270068
-3 -3 -5 0.9191554 -1.6841664183
-2 -2 -6 0.9297818 -0.0087306004
-4 -4 -4 0.9711255 -2.2589221048
Repeating this calculation with sin theta/lambda = 1.1 and a diff
with the old hkl will just show the additional reflections as expected:
diff hkl.10 hkl.11
20a21,26
> -1 -5 -5 1.0010132 1.6970975057
> -1 -1 -7 1.0010132 1.5391902602
> 0 -4 -6 1.0107794 0.0000000000
> -2 -4 -6 1.0489354 -2.0944311378
> -3 -5 -5 1.0766653 -1.4379800081
> -1 -3 -7 1.0766653 -1.4425910379
Now again repeat the calculation with sin theta/lambda = 1.2:
diff hkl.11 hkl.12
25,26c25,32
< -3 -5 -5 1.0766653 -1.4379800081
< -1 -3 -7 1.0766653 -1.4425910379
---
> -3 -5 -5 1.0766653 -1.4106390375
> -1 -3 -7 1.0766653 -1.4699320085
> 0 0 -8 1.1213591 1.9443586030
> -3 -3 -7 1.1473400 1.3618747163
> -4 -4 -6 1.1558705 0.0030399053
> 0 -2 -8 1.1558705 0.0000000000
> 0 -6 -6 1.1893809 1.7411783356
> -2 -2 -8 1.1893809 -1.8133181764
What happens here? Why are reflections which were exactly the same
before suddenly different? Why I worry about this is, that if you go
on increasing the resolution, the differences become more severe
than in the example above, i.e. sin theta/lambda = 1.3:
diff hkl.12 hkl.13
21,22c21,22
< -1 -5 -5 1.0010132 1.6970975057
< -1 -1 -7 1.0010132 1.5391902602
---
> -1 -5 -5 1.0010132 -1.5542465484
> -1 -1 -7 1.0010132 1.5480881986
On the other hand, the differences "converge" for a given reflection
but more and more become "affected", i.e. sin theta/lambda = 1.8
vs. 1.2:
diff hkl.12 hkl.18
21,22c21,22
< -1 -5 -5 1.0010132 1.6970975057
< -1 -1 -7 1.0010132 1.5391902602
---
> -1 -5 -5 1.0010132 -1.5542465484
> -1 -1 -7 1.0010132 1.5480881986
25,26c25,26
< -3 -5 -5 1.0766653 -1.4106390375
< -1 -3 -7 1.0766653 -1.4699320085
---
> -3 -5 -5 1.0766653 -1.4379800081
> -1 -3 -7 1.0766653 -1.4425910379
28c28
< -3 -3 -7 1.1473400 1.3618747163
---
> -3 -3 -7 1.1473400 -1.3370357923
31c31
< 0 -6 -6 1.1893809 1.7411783356
---
> 0 -6 -6 1.1893809 -1.8136982305
Looking at the result of a refinement of a structural model against
the different HKLs, the "high resolution version" seems to be
"wrong" compared to the low-res one.
Thank you very much in advance for any comments on this.
regards
Georg Eickerling
--
============================
Dr. Georg Eickerling
Universitaet Augsburg
Institut fuer Physik
Lehrstuhl fuer Chemische Physik und Materialwissenschaften
Universitaetsstr. 1
86159 Augsburg
E-Mail: georg.eickerling at physik.uni-augsburg.de
Phone: +49-821-598-3362
FAX: +49-821-598-3227
WWW: http://www.physik.uni-augsburg.de/cpm/
=====================================================
More information about the Wien
mailing list