[Wien] way to confirm stable/transition structures
tasaka at affinity-science.com
tasaka at affinity-science.com
Tue Oct 9 09:33:43 CEST 2012
Hi,
thank you for the detailed explanations.
> this is always the case which are well known although often omitted in
> simple textbooks. I am 99.8% certain that MSR1a will also not be
> trapped in a saddle point although there is currently no analytic
> proof of this.
I agreed, it was a help to me!
With best regards,
Tomo
----- Original Message -----
> This is a slightly complicated question. What you sent is a transition
> state, mathematically a saddle point. You are asking if within MINI
> (and/or MSR1a) you can get trapped in one.
>
> I can only answer for PORT & MSR1a. If you start a little away from a
> saddle point, and there are no other issues such as problems with
> touching RMTs or inconsistent forces, the program will converge to a
> true local minimum. There are some standard traps that ensure that
> this is always the case which are well known although often omitted in
> simple textbooks. I am 99.8% certain that MSR1a will also not be
> trapped in a saddle point although there is currently no analytic
> proof of this.
>
> A caveat. If you were to start at the exact saddle point (or very
> close to it) the mini code may decide that you have already converged
> and stop without checking. This is because the convergence criteria
> are just that the forces are small, not that the Hessian is positive
> definite (i.e. a local minimum).
>
> Another caveat. If you have a soft mode distortion away from the
> saddle point the code might also be fooled into thinking it has found
> a minimum whereas in reality it has not. PORT is quite good in
> avoiding this; MSR1a not quite so good for a number of reasons.
>
> And yet a third one. It is possible to force a saddle point using
> symmetry, for instance if you added a z-axis mirror.
>
> If you are concerned whether you have got trapped in a saddle point
> because you started there, move the atomic positions a bit and rerun.
>
> N.B., a different question is how to find a saddle point/transition
state.
>
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 4:55 AM, tasaka at affinity-science.com
> <tasaka at affinity-science.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > In MINI calculation, a relaxed structure is depend on initial
structure
> > in general. so, sometimes it might arrive to the transition
structure.
> > for example, please find the attached structure file.
> > for that case, how do we confirm the obtained structure whether
> > transition or stable structure, especially in wien2k-code?
> >
> > sorry if it's a silly question, but any information would be
appreciated.
> >
> > With best regards,
> > Tomo
>
>
>
> --
> Professor Laurence Marks
> Department of Materials Science and Engineering
> Northwestern University
> www.numis.northwestern.edu 1-847-491-3996
> "Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what
> nobody else has thought"
> Albert Szent-Gyorgi
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>
More information about the Wien
mailing list