[Wien] case.inhf

[ali ghafari]

Dear Prof. Blaha

For hybrid functionals case.inhf is necessary as discussed in the UG on pages 49 and 97. But the value of "nband' at case.inhf is confusing. on the page 97 of UG has mentioned "  .... nband should be at least equal to the number of (partially) occupied bands plus one". While at the line 5 of case.in1 the value of nband is automatically determined ( UG page 102) by "   nband = ne ∗ 2.0 + 5 " which is number of eigenvalues. Can we consider inband of case.inhf is equals: (eigenvalues -5)/2+1 which is extracted from case.in1?
   

Best Regards
Ali
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120919/088dfa09/attachment.htm>