[Wien] Clarification on (a) effective moment including spin-orbit coupling and (b) spin-state configuration
tran at theochem.tuwien.ac.at
tran at theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Wed Oct 2 11:24:36 CEST 2013
(i) I don't know Sr2CoO4, but if Co1 and Co2 are inequivalent (e.g., they
have a different environment), then maybe this is not surprising.
(ii) SPIN MAGNETIC MOMENT IN CELL is the number of up-electrons minus the
number of down-electrons.
(iii) You can use "instgen_lapw -ask" to generate case.inst. Don't
forget, before "runsp_lapw - ...", to generate the electron density:
x lstart
x dstart
x dstart -up
x dstart -dn
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013, Kalpana wrote:
> Dear wien-users,
>
> Using runsp_lapw -so I obtain the converged results for Sr2CoO4 doped with La to Sr-site:
>
> With U=4 eV for Co1 and Co2, I obtain their spin-moment as:
> :MMI001: MAGNETIC MOMENT IN SPHERE 1 = 1.83531
> :MMI002: MAGNETIC MOMENT IN SPHERE 2 = 2.60958
>
> orbital moment as:
> :ORB001: ORBITAL MOMENT: 0.00000 0.00000 0.81759 PROJECTION ON M 0.81759
> :ORB002: ORBITAL MOMENT: 0.00000 0.00000 0.76033 PROJECTION ON M 0.76033
>
> total spin-moment in a cell is:
> :MMTOT: SPIN MAGNETIC MOMENT IN CELL = 4.72942
>
>
> My question here are:
>
> (i) Why Co1 having less spin-moment have larger orbital moment compared to Co2
> (ii) When considering the GGA+U+SOC (spin-orbit coupling), I find that the results on spin-magnetic moment in a cell
> significantly changes with respect to GGA+U.
> For example,
> With GGA+U ==== :MMTOT: SPIN MAGNETIC MOMENT IN CELL = 5.00042
> With GGA+U+SOC ==== :MMTOT: SPIN MAGNETIC MOMENT IN CELL = 4.72942
>
> Could you please clarify if the SPIN MAGNETIC MOMENT IN CELL with GGA+U+SOC calculations is the effective moment or something
> else because if we add.
>
> (iii) I also could not understand how to create:
> (a) High-spin configuration
> (b) Intermediate spin configuration
> (c) Low-spin configuration
> from the given case.inst for Co atoms. Please help to generate this spin-configurations!
> For my studied system, the case.inst file of Co atoms looks like:
> Co
> Ar 3
> 3, 2,2.0 N
> 3, 2,2.0 N
> 3,-3,3.0 N
> 3,-3,0.0 N
> 4,-1,1.0 N
> 4,-1,1.0 N
> Co
> Ar 3
> 3, 2,2.0 N
> 3, 2,2.0 N
> 3,-3,3.0 N
> 3,-3,0.0 N
> 4,-1,1.0 N
> 4,-1,1.0 N
>
>
> I need your assistance to resolve these issues...
> Thanks
> Kalpana
>
>
More information about the Wien
mailing list