[Wien] Error while running +/- 0.5e calculation

Gavin Abo gsabo at crimson.ua.edu
Sun Jan 4 17:55:48 CET 2015


Probably, you cannot get the 'same' result (just something close to it).

Madsen and Novak got F_eff = 0.438 Ry [ 
http://www.wien2k.at/reg_user/textbooks/Constraint_U.pdf ].  However, 
keep in mind that they wrote this document in 2007, so the calculation 
was likely with a WIEN2k version 7 or 8 [ 
http://www.wien2k.at/reg_user/updates/ ].  Maybe, they were using 32 bit 
(probably more predominate at that time).  I expect they were using an 
older ifort/mkl (new at that time, but old today).   So differences in 
things like WIEN2k version, between 32 and 64 bit systems, and libraries 
(mkl, fftw) likely make it not possible to reproduce exactly.

Following the steps in Constraint_U.pdf, I got F_eff = ~0.4408 Ry.  When 
compared to Madsen and Novak's result, the percent error is less then 1 
%, |(0.441-0.438)/0.438|*100% = 0.68 %).

The percent error in your case seems high (20 %):

F_eff = 
(4*-0.007129869+5*-0.027686778)/9-(4*(-0.332762453)+5*(-0.333786554))/9-0.43229+0.46699 
= 0.349481024
|(0.349-0.438)/0.438|*100% = 20.3 %

As you can see in the table below, the big differences are coming from 
your :3DD001 and :3D 001 values for NiO_+.50.  So this suggests that the 
problem is with your NiO_+.50 calculation.


	

NiO_+.50

	

NiO_+.5-1

	

Mine

	

Yours

	

Mine

	

Yours

:FER

	

0.4779683788

	

0.43229

	

0.5182555839

	

0.46699

:3DD001

	

0.109619395

	

-0.007129869

	

-0.291937436

	

-0.332762453

:3D 001

	

0.126211972

	

-0.027686778

	

-0.273539538

	

-0.333786554


On 1/4/2015 4:41 AM, Abed Reg wrote:
> Thank you Mr Gavin for your reply and especially for your interesting 
> to my questions.
>
> I have fixed the error and there was a problem in the structure file. 
> Now every thing is ok but i didn't find the same results as in the 
> paper of Madsen and novak.
>
> My results are as follows:
>
> 1/ First result
>
> --- FER -----------
> in  1 files:
> NiO_+.50.scf::FER  : F E R M I - ENERGY(GAUSS-.M.)=   0.43229
> --- 3dd001 -----------
> in  1 files:
> NiO_+.50.scf::3DD001: 3D*                 -0.007129869 Ry
>
> 2/ Second result
> --- FER -----------
> in  1 files:
> NiO_+.50.scf::FER  : F E R M I - ENERGY(GAUSS-.M.)=   0.43229
> --- 3d -----------
> in  1 files:
> NiO_+.50.scf::3D 001: 3D                  -0.027686778 Ry
>
> 3/ Third result
>
> --- FER -----------
> in  1 files:
> NiO_+.5-0.scf::FER  : F E R M I - ENERGY(GAUSS-.M.)=   0.46699
> --- 3dd001 -----------
> in  1 files:
> NiO_+.5-0.scf::3DD001: 3D*                 -0.332762453 Ry
>
> 4/ Fourth result
>
> --- FER -----------
> in  1 files:
> NiO_+.5-0.scf::FER  : F E R M I - ENERGY(GAUSS-.M.)=   0.46699
> --- 3d -----------
> in  1 files:
> NiO_+.5-0.scf::3D 001: 3D                  -0.333786554 Ry
>
> When i have applied the equation i did'nt find the same result as in the paper
>
> My result is U= 0.314 Ry
>
> Then i think i have made mistake but i don't know where?
>
> My best regards
> -- 
> Mr: A.Reggad
> Laboratoire de Génie Physique
> Université Ibn Khaldoun - Tiaret
> Algerie
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20150104/81b3a57a/attachment.html>


More information about the Wien mailing list