[Wien] x w2w in wien2wannier
Elias Assmann
elias.assmann at gmail.com
Tue Oct 27 13:28:53 CET 2015
Dear Fang,
I am taking this back on list because it might be of interest to others.
On 10/27/2015 12:46 PM, Yue-Wen Fang wrote:
> *Another question:*
> I inspected the fitted band using 512 kpoints , the shape of it was same
> to the bands generated by wien2k-lapw, nevertheless the values between
> them had discrepancy, it looked that the fitted one's Fermi level was
> shifted and scaled by certain factor, what may cause this error? I
> looked up the manual, but didn't get answer by myself. The band
> structure created by the command "p ’case.spaghetti ene’ u ($4/0.53):5,
> ’case band.dat’ w l" was attached.
The image you attached ⟨http://i.imgur.com/dLbUo6V.jpg⟩ looks as if the
Wien2k bands are okay, but the Wannier bands are “compressed” by some
factor on the energy scale, rather than shifted as by a wrong Fermi
level. (It is hard to tell by eye if that is the whole difference, but
at least they are much too narrow.) I do not know how that would
happen. Did you apply any post-processing? Choose different units in
Wannier90?
Do your projections pass the other usual tests (spreads, H(R))?
Otherwise, they might just be wrong.
--
Elias Assmann
Institute of Theoretical and Computational Physics
TU Graz ⟨https://itp.tugraz.at/⟩
More information about the Wien
mailing list