[Wien] Diference in EFG values
Stefaan Cottenier
stefaan.cottenier at ugent.be
Tue Sep 15 13:55:33 CEST 2015
> According to my understanding, core-state with tag F are valence states.
> AM I right? If yes then why it is taking 3P states as valence states?
> The valence electrons for Co are 3d7, 4s2.
You use the words 'valence electrons' in the traditional 'chemical' way
as states outside the noble gas core. In the context of the DFT, the
term 'valence electrons' refers to all states that are not forced to
behave as in a free atom (i.e. they allow to feel the presence of the
surrounding crystal).
You cannot avoid to use Co-3p as valence states with wien2k, the
numerics would break down if you didn't.
Your output shows that wien2k has Co-3s and Co-3p as valence states,
whereas vasp considers these as core states (i.e. they will not
contribute to the EFG in vasp). Co-3s will never contribute to the EFG
(spherical), whereas Co-3p could (albeit not very likely).
First consider the suggestion by Peter Blaha: make sure you have
identical XC-functionals in both codes, and inspect whether all magnetic
moments and the DOS and band structure pictures agree for both codes.
If that is all right, then use the procedure to which I refered in my
previous post to isolate the EFG contribution of Co-3p. If that is
nearly zero, I don't know what is going on. If it would be equal to the
vasp-wien2k difference, then you have found the origin of your problem.
Stefaan
More information about the Wien
mailing list