[Wien] Semi core band-ranges too large while finding best Rmt*Kmax
Stefaan Cottenier
stefaan.cottenier at ugent.be
Mon Feb 22 17:00:43 CET 2016
> I’m sorry, I forgot to tell that I’m considering beta-Ga2O3 and not
> alpha-Ga2O3.
>
> In the .scf1 file I have a warning:
>
> :WAR : 1 EIGENVALUES BELOW THE ENERGY -14.00000
>
> I didn’t change the value of Emin in the .in1 file, so I used the
> default -14 Ry as you did.
> Should I lower it in order to make the warning disappear?
OK, I can confirm your observation for beta-Ga2O3. Starting from the
cif, and using this sequence of commands:
cif2struct start.cif
cp start.struct beta-Ga2O3.struct
x sgroup
cp beta-Ga2O3.struct_sgroup beta-Ga2O3.struct
setrmt -r 5 beta-Ga2O3
cp beta-Ga2O3.struct_setrmt beta-Ga2O3.struct
init -b -ecut -11 -numk 500 -rkmax 6
run_lapw -cc 0.001
save_lapw -a rkm6
(change RKM from 6 to 9)
run_lapw -cc 0.001
it gives this error in the first iteration:
LAPW1 END
LAPW2: semicore band-ranges too large
There are 'eigenvalues below...' errors in case.scf1. Emin has to be
lowered -40 Ry (!) in order to get rid of those:
K= 0.10000 0.12500 0.00000 1
MATRIX SIZE 2425 WEIGHT= 2.00 PGR:
EIGENVALUES ARE:
-36.7224567 -29.1674472 -17.3058655 -14.2200370 -10.0319827
-10.0319804 -10.0213123 -10.0213070 -6.4133083 -6.4131634
-6.4131632 -6.4129289 -6.4087933 -6.4087569 -6.4033183
-6.4033066 -6.4007536 -6.4007390 -6.3990601 -6.3983440
But even then the band range error is still there:
Bandranges (emin - emax) and occupancy:
:WARN :BAN00001: 1 -39.990042 -24.394804 2.00000000
The problem persists if you start from a reinitialization (avoiding the
previous convergence with smaller RKM, but having Emin=-40 right away):
K= 0.05000 0.12500 0.05000 1
:RKM : MATRIX SIZE 2425LOs: 102 RKM= 9.00 WEIGHT= 2.00 PGR:
EIGENVALUES ARE:
:EIG00001: -24.7321870 -17.8379385 -9.8935838 -9.8935771
-9.8927672
:EIG00006: -9.8927595 -7.7404445 -6.2892525 -6.2748230
-6.2748075
There are still 4 Ga-3s states around -9.9 Ry. The two spurious deep
states at -24 and -17 Ry are ghost bands. They probably appear because
for the small spheres you have here (RMT-O = 1.55) a RKM of 9 is *very*
large.
Quick fixes (no time for a full analysis...):
* either avoid the Ga-3s as valence at all (-ecut -8)
* don't go to that high RKM in your convergence testing. For a RMT=1.55,
a RKM=9 corresponds to RKM=12.8 (!) for RMT=2.2, or RKM=14.5 for RMT=2.5
. When you use RKM=6, you have already a very good basis set for these
small RMT.
Stefaan
More information about the Wien
mailing list