[Wien] problem in 2Doptimize.job or in my method ...

[Lyudmila Dobysheva]

12.01.2017 01:15, Dr. K. C. Bhamu wrote:
>     _In the new test, I did not encounter the nn problem for "-6 -4 -2 0
>     2 4 6" volume changes and -4, -2, 0 2 4 for c/a._
>     _Should I take this small value only? __I wanted to optimise it for
>     some more parameters but it giving nn error beyod these range._

Yes, first you optimize in the range which works, then you look at the 
results and if the minimum that you are searching is inside this range - 
you have it, if it is at closer distance (where now you have the nn 
problem) you decrease Rmt and calculate again.

Best wishes
   Lyudmila Dobysheva
------------------------------------------------------------------
Phys.-Techn. Institute of Ural Br. of Russian Ac. of Sci.
426001 Izhevsk, ul.Kirova 132
RUSSIA
------------------------------------------------------------------
Tel.:7(3412) 432045(office), 722529(Fax)
E-mail: lyu at ftiudm.ru, lyuka17 at mail.ru (office)
         lyuka17 at gmail.com (home)
Skype:  lyuka17 (home), lyuka18 (office)
http://ftiudm.ru/content/view/25/103/lang,english/
------------------------------------------------------------------