[Wien] Problem Regarding SLATER Calculations
apande at iitk.ac.in
apande at iitk.ac.in
Tue Jun 27 11:11:48 CEST 2017
Dear Wien2k users,I am doing the band gap of Ne(fcc) calculation using
Slater Potential and facing a problem. I am doing following steps:
1. Generate the structure
Neon: Ne |space group : 225 |Lattice constant = 4.47A |Position(0,0,0)
RMT set automatically to 0%
2. Initialize LAPW Calculation : initialize calc.
Select Spin Polarized Calculation
VXC option (default i.e. 13: PBE)
RKmax : 7 (default)
3. Initialize hartree fock calculation : init_hf_lapw
edit case.inhf
The initial file looked like
0.25 alpha
T screened (T) or unscreened (F)
.165 lambda
xx nband
6 gmax
3 lmaxe
3 lmaxv
1d-3 tolu
The file modified was
1 alpha
F screened (T) or unscreened (F)
10 nband
6 gmax
3 lmaxe
3 lmaxv
1d-3 tolu
4. Edit input file
In files the case.in0 was edited
XC_PBE was replaced by VX_SLATER (as mentioned in the user guide) . The
file was saved.
5. SCF cycle
The command run_vnonlocal_lapw(-sp) was put in the command line and the
SCF cycle was initiated.
6. Final Results
The calculations converged and the band gap came out to be : 10.813eV
7.THE PROBLEM
The band gap calculated deviates drastically from the value provided in
the following paper (ie 15.58).
How Close Are the Slater and Becke-Roussel Potentials in Solids?
- F.Tran, P Blaha , K. Schwarz
Neon has only been taken as an example to highlight the problem. The
deviation was still prominent in all the many others calculations
performed ( For eg Ar : 7.766 eV calculated , 9.95 eV according to the
paper.)
With Regards
Aditya Pande
More information about the Wien
mailing list