[Wien] convergence problem
fatima DFT
fatimadft5 at gmail.com
Sat May 27 00:04:41 CEST 2017
Thank you Sir,
Your answer helped me to identify the source of error. The structure file
is not good. Now I have new structure file and the optimization is going on
as expected.
The new structure is taken from this paper: Alonso et al.
<http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ic990921e>
Table 2 column 2.
But the authors (also most of the authors) have reported this structure as
Pbnm and when I initialized the structure it shows a warning and automatic
stabilize in Pnma SG.
Is this normal?
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Laurence Marks <L-marks at northwestern.edu>
wrote:
> Most structures (almost all) have higher symmetry. You probably used a
> not so good location for the structure.
>
Yes, it was the problem in structure. Now I have new structure file and
optimization is going on as expected.
>
> Pr is a rare-earth with a normal valence of +3, for which you need +U
> or -eece otherwise the unoccupied 4f will turn it metallic. Not sure
> if you need it for +U to get an insulator; for a proper result you
> probably do.
>
> I strongly suggest that you run many more simpler cases using MSR1a
> before trying something as hard as this.
>
> Sure, Sir! I should test many test cases first.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20170527/d0bdbb51/attachment.html>
More information about the Wien
mailing list