[Wien] Optical properties with SO coupling
Jaroslav Hamrle
hamrle at karlov.mff.cuni.cz
Thu Oct 5 09:57:39 CEST 2017
Dear Gavin,
I will describe my observation:
I have calculated optical (epzz) and magneto-optical (K, for example
K=epxy for M001) spectra of permittivity elements for bcc Fe.
The electronic structure calculations are spin polarized, with
spin-orbit, run by commands:
runsp_lapw -p
runsp_lapw -p -so -cc 0.000001 -ec 0.0000001 -s lapw1
x lapw2 -p -fermi -up -so
x optic -p -up -so
x joint -p -up
For w2k version 16.1, the calculated spectra corresponds to the
experimental spectra (for both epzz and K).
For w2k version 17.1, the calculated spectra are half-value for both
epzz and K, compared to the experiment.
Figures comparing spectra are here:
http://alma.karlov.mff.cuni.cz/hamrle/w2kfig/Fe_Imepzz_compare.pdf
http://alma.karlov.mff.cuni.cz/hamrle/w2kfig/Fe_ReK_compare.pdf
In this example, I used permittivity spectra read directly from
case.jointup files (I do not use output of kram).
In the figures:
- solid (noisy) line is output from case.jointup
- the symbols are smeared spectra
- black '+' are the experimental spectra
- blue 'o' and red 'x' are spectra calculated by w2k version 17
- green '+' and yellow '*' are spectra calculated by w2k version 16
- y-axis denotes permittivity*E (in eV).
That is why I have concluded that joint function in w2k version 17 has a
bug in calculation of the optical permittivity. But I have not tested
non-magnetic cases, I did it only for bcc Fe (sp+so).
Hoping it helps.
If I can help more, please let me know..
With my regards
Jaro
On 04/10/17 16:40, Gavin Abo wrote:
>
> Dear Jaro,
>
> I thought the spin-polarized SO optic normalization was broken in
> older versions of WIEN2k and was fixed in 17.1:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg16011.html
>
> Is it still broken?
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Gavin
>
> On 10/3/2017 4:30 PM, Jaroslav Hamrle wrote:
>> Hallo,
>>
>> to calculate optical properties of Ni, after calculating electronic
>> structure being spin-polarized and being with spin-orbit, do:
>>
>> 1) create both case.inop (your file looks correct) and case.injoint
>>
>> Example of case.injoint is:
>> ==== example of case.injoint =======
>> 1 9999 9999 : LOWER,UPPER and (optional) UPPER-VAL
>> BANDINDEX
>> 0.0000 0.00100 1.0000 : EMIN DE EMAX FOR ENERGYGRID IN ryd
>> eV : output units eV / ryd / cm-1
>> 4 : SWITCH
>> 9 : NUMBER OF COLUMNS
>> 0.1 0.1 0.3 : BROADENING (FOR DRUDE MODEL - switch
>> 6,7 -
>> ONLY)
>>
>> SWITCH:
>>
>> 0...JOINTDOS FOR EACH BAND COMBINATION
>> 1...JOINTDOS AS SUM OVER ALL BAND COMBINATIONS
>> 2...DOS FOR EACH BAND
>> 3...DOS AS SUM OVER ALL BANDS
>> 4...Im(EPSILON)
>> 5...Im(EPSILON) for each band combination
>> 6...INTRABAND contributions
>> 7...INTRABAND contributions including band analysis
>> ===== end example case.injoint ====
>>
>> Now, you have to decide if you want to calculate optics at finer
>> k-mesh than electronic structure, or the same mesh. In case
>> electronic structure is calculated with k-mesh 30x30x30, it is good
>> enough for Imxy and MOKE.
>>
>> 2a) when keeping the same k-mesh for optical calculations as for
>> electronic structure, do:
>>
>> x lapw2 -p -fermi -up -so
>> x optic -p -up -so (your command in your email is opticc, i.e.
>> complex variant of command optic; opticc should be used when the
>> structure lacks point symmetry, which Ni does not)
>> x joint -up
>> x kram -up
>>
>> 2b) when you want mesh for optical calculations to be finer, do:
>> x kgen -so (to generate finer mesh)
>> in third line in case.in2, change value of TETRA to be 101
>> x lapw1 -p -up
>> x lapw1 -p -dn
>> x lapwso -up -p
>> x lapw2 -p -fermi -up -so
>> x optic -so -up -p
>> x joint -up -p
>> x kram -up
>>
>>
>> 3) When using w2k version 17.1, there is a bug in the function joint
>> when electronic structure is spin-polarized case with so. In this
>> case, all optical constant outgoing function joint have half values
>> for w2k ver 17.1 compared to previous w2k versions. So either use w2k
>> version 16.1 or smaller, or with w2k version 17.1, simply multiply
>> all optical constants by factor 2.
>>
>> Hoping it helps
>> Best regards
>>
>> Jaro
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mgr. Jaroslav Hamrle, Ph.D.
Institute of Physics, room F232
Faculty of Mathematics and Physics
Charles University
Ke Karlovu 5
121 16 Prague
Czech Republic
tel: +420-95155 1340
email: hamrle at karlov.mff.cuni.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20171005/0d5f7378/attachment.html>
More information about the Wien
mailing list