[Wien] why we need to divide plasma frequency by root(2)?
Dr. K. C. Bhamu
kcbhamu85 at gmail.com
Sun Oct 22 00:17:29 CEST 2017
This is in continuation to my previous email about -sp+-so (final answer on
that email is still needed).
meanwhile, I have calculated plasma frequency for a metal case and I got
below (case is -sp+-so):
Plasma frequencies:
!!! WARNING: w_pl = sqrt( w_pl^2(up-spin) + w_pl^2(dn-spin) )!!!
w_p_xx w_p_yy w_p_zz [eV]
2.0740 2.0740 1.2640
So the format of my case.inkram should be
---------------------case.injoint
xx
xx
xx
2.0740 2.0740 1.2640
xx
-----------------------------------
were xx means no change in lines of case.inkram.
At page numer 164 under section "8.11 KRAM (Kramers-Kronig transformation)
in UG"
*"For a metal, the Plasma-frequencies (intraband transitions) for up and dn
should be added, but then divided by√2, before using x kram." *
Does it mean that we need to add all three components and then divide by
root(2) and put a single number [(2.074+2.074+1.264)/root(2)=3.88] instead
of all three in case.injoint?
kind regards
Bhamu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20171022/ef4636f1/attachment.html>
More information about the Wien
mailing list