[Wien] why we need to divide plasma frequency by root(2)?

Gavin Abo gsabo at crimson.ua.edu
Sun Oct 22 00:42:34 CEST 2017


I could be wrong, but I think you just need to take the sqrt(2) of each 
plasma frequency:

2.074/sqrt(2) 2.074/sqrt(2) 1.264/sqrt(2)

then put them in case.inkram (not case.injoint).

You should be able to use multiple plasma frequencies in case.inkram but 
don't forget to add a Gamma for drude value for each of the plasma 
frequencies [ 
https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg14495.html 
].

On 10/21/2017 4:29 PM, Dr. K. C. Bhamu wrote:
>
>
>     ---------------------case.injoint
>     xx
>     xx
>     1 >> correction
>     2.0740 2.0740 1.2640
>     xx
>     -----------------------------------
>
>     were xx means no change in lines of case.inkram.
>
>
>
>     At page numer  164 under section "8.11 KRAM (Kramers-Kronig
>     transformation) in UG"
>
>
>     *"For a metal, the Plasma-frequencies (intraband transitions) for
>     up and dn should be added, but then divided by√2, before using x
>     kram." *
>
>     Does it mean that we need to add all three components and then
>     divide by root(2) and put a single number
>     [(2.074+2.074+1.264)/root(2)=3.88] instead of all three in
>     case.injoint?
>
>
>     kind regards
>
>     Bhamu
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20171021/804288e2/attachment.html>


More information about the Wien mailing list