[Wien] why we need to divide plasma frequency by root(2)?
Gavin Abo
gsabo at crimson.ua.edu
Sun Oct 22 00:42:34 CEST 2017
I could be wrong, but I think you just need to take the sqrt(2) of each
plasma frequency:
2.074/sqrt(2) 2.074/sqrt(2) 1.264/sqrt(2)
then put them in case.inkram (not case.injoint).
You should be able to use multiple plasma frequencies in case.inkram but
don't forget to add a Gamma for drude value for each of the plasma
frequencies [
https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg14495.html
].
On 10/21/2017 4:29 PM, Dr. K. C. Bhamu wrote:
>
>
> ---------------------case.injoint
> xx
> xx
> 1 >> correction
> 2.0740 2.0740 1.2640
> xx
> -----------------------------------
>
> were xx means no change in lines of case.inkram.
>
>
>
> At page numer 164 under section "8.11 KRAM (Kramers-Kronig
> transformation) in UG"
>
>
> *"For a metal, the Plasma-frequencies (intraband transitions) for
> up and dn should be added, but then divided by√2, before using x
> kram." *
>
> Does it mean that we need to add all three components and then
> divide by root(2) and put a single number
> [(2.074+2.074+1.264)/root(2)=3.88] instead of all three in
> case.injoint?
>
>
> kind regards
>
> Bhamu
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20171021/804288e2/attachment.html>
More information about the Wien
mailing list