[Wien] Qestion about DOS results
delamora
delamora at unam.mx
Wed Dec 12 00:52:58 CET 2018
Sorry, I thought that you had only two U atoms and the system I found had 16 formula units.
In this case, U3O8 with 1 formula unit in the cell, then you have a magnetic compound and you should get a different DOS for UP and for DN
Now, if you put the system in antiferromagnetic order then you would get the same UP and DN DOS
________________________________
Dear all
Sorry, my reply to the original mail chain is waiting for the moderator approval! So I am sending this as a new email.
............................................................
I have actually considered hubard-U (4.5 eV is included) and spin orbital coupling also added. My structure is U3O8,
case.indmc
-12.0000 Emin cutoff energy
2 number of atoms for which density matrix is calculated
1 1 3 index of 1st atom, number of L, L1
2 1 3 index of 1st atom, number of L, L1
0 0 krad, kls
case.inorb
1 2 0 nmod, natorb, ipr
PRATT 1.0 BROYD/PRATT, mixing
1 1 3 iatom nlorb, lorb
2 1 3 iatom nlorb, lorb
1 nsic 0..AMF, 1..SIC, 2..HFM
0.3307 0.00 U J (Ry) Note: we recommend to use U_eff = U-J and J=0
0.3307 0.00 U J
I am having a followup question for your comments.
1. Can I conclude FM for my system?
because: atom-1(uranium1) is non-magnetic, atom-2 uranium (multiplicity is 2 for this atom) has a magnetic moment of 0.71935. These two uranium has parallel magnetism.
2. This system is U3O8, (not U2O5). It has only 11 atoms in the unit cell as 1 (U), 2(U), 2(U), 3(O), 4(O), 4(O), 5 (O), 6(O), 6(O), 7(O), 7(O).
With this, is this possible to accept the obtained DOS?
(And do we necessarily should get different DOS for FM/AFM cases for their spin UP/DN cases?
Thank you
Shayam
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20181211/d32ec884/attachment.html>
More information about the Wien
mailing list