[Wien] a note on lattice parameter optimization
tran at theochem.tuwien.ac.at
tran at theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Thu Feb 8 09:58:45 CET 2018
Hi,
Did you use mBJ to calculate the band gap in both procedures?
FT
On Thursday 2018-02-08 09:35, Dr. K. C. Bhamu wrote:
>Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 09:35:08
>From: Dr. K. C. Bhamu <kcbhamu85 at gmail.com>
>Reply-To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users <wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
>To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users <Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
>Subject: [Wien] a note on lattice parameter optimization
>
>Hello,
>
>Using experimental lattice parameters(a Ang), I optimized the structure with two options.
>
>1. Directly optimized the structure without min_lapw ... and the optimized lattice parameters are in the vicinity of Exp a (~0.01 Ang accuracy) and the calculated band gap (from mBJ2) is in agreement with reported value ~0.3 eV less.
>
>2. First relaxed the structure and then optimized this relaxed structure (without min_lapw ....). In this case the optimized lattice parameters are reduced by ~0.05 Ang and the band gap vanished or largely reduced.
>
>
>Why is the second way of doing band structure not working?
>
>I tested it on many systems. In some case system became metal and in some cases band gap largely reduced when I used the fully relaxed structure for optimization.
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>
>Bhamu
>
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the Wien
mailing list