[Wien] Lapwso crashes with Intel 2018 update 1
Osama Yassin
oayassin63 at outlook.com
Mon Jan 15 10:42:49 CET 2018
Dear Gavin
- Compilation with the option -assume buffered_io did not solve the problem.
- By using the file get_nloat.f<https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg16589/get_nloat.f> provided by Eamon McDermott, the nloat message disappeared but a new error appeared after lapwso end
L2main - QTL-B Error
<http://susi.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/reg_user/faq/qtlb.html>Thus I conclude that it is because of compilation issue related to Intel FC 2018 update 1.
Still working on it and looking for your help.
Osama
QTL-B - FAQ - WIEN2k<http://susi.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/reg_user/faq/qtlb.html>
susi.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
In some cases (mostly when the spheres are extremely small or you have heavy elements) it may even happen, that during the (first or later) scf-cycle LAPW2 stops with ...
Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
________________________________
From: Wien <wien-bounces at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at> on behalf of Gavin Abo <gsabo at crimson.ua.edu>
Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2018 7:04:36 PM
To: wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Subject: Re: [Wien] Lapwso crashes with Intel 2018 update 1
It does look like that might be caused by the Intel compiler version (2018 update 1) that you are using.
Have you tried compiling with -assume nobuffered_io [ https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg16802.html ]?
increase nloat in module -> This likely means the nloat value of the MODULE param block in SRC_lapwso/modules.F. However, that comment might be old such that I don't recommend changing the value by hand, because it looks like the code in get_nloat.f now automatically adjusts the nloat value for you.
Have you tried Eamon's workaround fix for get_nloat.f [ https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg16589.html ]?
On 1/12/2018 11:12 PM, Osama Yassin wrote:
Dear Gavin Abo
- I have installed Intel Compiler 2108 update 1. Then Wien2k 17.1 was complied successfully (serial and parallel).
- Normal SCF cycles completed successfully using SCAN meta-GGA or PBE-GGA.
- SOC was initiated from the command line using initiso_lapw. The case.inso is
WFFIL
4 0 0 llmax,ipr,kpot
-10 1.5 Emin, Emax
0 0 1 h,k,l (direction of magnetization)
0 number of atoms with RLO
0 0 number of atoms without SO, atomnumbers
- the case.in1 is:
WFFIL EF=.61137685760000000019 (WFFIL, WFPRI, ENFIL, SUPWF)
7.00 11 4 ELPA pxq hm (R-MT*K-MAX,MAX L IN
0.30 4 0 (GLOBAL E-PARAMETER WITH n OTHER CHOICES, global APW/LAPW)
1 0.30 0.0000 CONT 1
1 -3.77 0.0001 STOP 1
2 0.30 0.0010 CONT 1
0 0.30 0.0000 CONT 1
K-VECTORS FROM UNIT:4 -9.0 5.0 19 emin / de (emax=Ef+de) / nband
- The lapwso crashes
> stop error
[1] + Done ( cd $PWD; $t $exe ${def}_${loop}.def; rm -f .lock_$lockfile[$p] ) >> .timeso_$loop
increase nloat in module (atpar --- lo part) 53 52
[1] + Done ( cd $PWD; $t $exe ${def}_${loop}.def; rm -f .lock_$lockfile[$p] ) >> .timeso_$loop
[2] + Done ( cd $PWD; $t $exe ${def}_${loop}.def; rm -f .lock_$lockfile[$p] ) >> .timeso_$loop
TOO MANY BANDS:
- changing the number of bands does not succeed.
- On another run I get this: Here i used mBJ+soc. Previously this case was successful with intel 2017.
lapwso 00000000004043AA Unknown Unknown Unknown
libc-2.24.so 00001460B54A0431 __libc_start_main Unknown Unknown
lapwso 00000000004044AE Unknown Unknown Unknown
lapwso 000000000042043E MAIN__ 591 lapwso.F
lapwso 0000000000414D18 hmsec_ 231 hmsec.F
lapwso 000000000040DDE7 abclm_ 187 abclm.F
lapwso 0000000000421B94 lomain_ 55 lomain.F
libpthread-2.24.s 00001460B611D5D0 Unknown Unknown Unknown
lapwso 000000000044490D Unknown Unknown Unknown
Image PC Routine Line Source
forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
TOO MANY KJS:
- What does increase nloat in module .....
best wishes
Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20180115/66a36114/attachment.html>
More information about the Wien
mailing list