[Wien] Memory in the k-parallel method exceeds NMATMAX ?
Peter Blaha
pblaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Fri Jul 6 11:02:36 CEST 2018
You did not specify the corresponding :RKM values, which lists the
actual matrix size in your calculations.
Two remarks: the quoted numbers are typical averages with "sensible
RMTs and close-packed structures.
I do not understand / believe the supercell sizes. What is a supercell
with 17 atoms ? How do you create from 10 atoms --> 17 atoms ??
What are your RMT values ???
PS: k-parallel means you are using n lapw1 runs, and each of them
requires the same memory. So of course, when running on a single cpu n
k-parallel jobs, you need n times the memory of a single calculation.
Am 05.07.2018 um 16:32 schrieb Luc Fruchter:
> [ ... I apolodgize for having not responded yet to a pending discussion
> that I already have for another subject - and probably to this one also
> for a while, but the mail archive webmaster agrees than one cannot
> answer with 'reply button' until this is fixed ...]
>
> Here is my problem,
>
> I am running cases of supercells of different sizes, using the
> k-parallel method. To make it simple, I only consider a 10 cores machine
> running these cores locally.
>
> The machine has 32 Gb memory, and NTMATMAX was set according to the
> installation suggestion:
>
> NTMATMAX = 19000 (2 Gb)
> NUME = 6000
>
> The cases I have run presently are from group 26 (no inversion), with
> number of atoms ranging from 10 to 22, depending on the supercell size.
>
> I find the following memory requirements, using k-parallel method, fixed
> k grid and default RKMAX:
>
> Number of atoms / memory per CPU used
> 10 / 1.7 Gb
> 12 / 2
> 15 / 2.7
> 17 / 3.1
> 22 / 4.3
>
> So, this exceeds what I expected to be the maximum limit (from manual p.
> 255 ~ 2 Go / CPU) and precludes the computation of larger cells, using
> reasonable memory (3-6 Gb / CPU). Increasing the number of CPU will not
> solve the problem, as the memory per CPU needed appears proportional to
> the number of these CPUs.
>
> Could someone recall the general principles for memory usage estimate in
> the k-parallel method, and how I could be able to run larger cells
> within these principles ?
>
>
> Thanks
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300 FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
Email: blaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at WIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at
WWW:
http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at/tc_blaha-------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Wien
mailing list