[Wien] some queries from 2Doptimization
Dr. K. C. Bhamu
kcbhamu85 at gmail.com
Wed May 30 17:46:26 CEST 2018
Dear Wien2k Users,
I finished lattice parameter optimization with 2Doptimize (set2D) script
for AFM case.
I gave me a nice parabola fit for MB Eqn.
At the end of ana2D_lapw I see below parameters
#####################################
Vol-opt= 6477.2543 , coa-opt= 2.4690
a0= 13.7918 , c0= 34.0519 bohr
a
*0= 7.2983 , c0= 18.019 Ang *
*or a0=13.79178818 c0= 34.050975
Bohr--------------------------------------------------------------------
Say this is Eqn.-(1)*
then "parabolfit_lapw -t 2 -scf '*.scf'" gave me below parameters (the pink
and blue may be "a" and "c", respectively):
AFM.ene and AFM.latparam generated
Enter dimension of fit (number of variable lattice parameters, 1-6):
2 fitcase 6 parameter
lowest data point: -197507.047435900 14.3863200000000
35.5987000000000
36 -197506.997315480 -197506.995255490
-197506.995195780 -197506.989177860 -197506.989866030
-197506.979961790 -197507.046392950 -197507.044306660
-197507.045024960 -197507.038881620 -197507.040400960
************** skipping some data here************
-197506.841649710 -197507.039826230 -197507.041358040
-197506.834684780 -197506.829326540 -197507.031120700
-197506.824849460
I INITIAL X(I) D(I)
1 -0.197507D+06 0.100D+01
2 0.100000D+00 0.102D+01
3 0.143863D+02 0.600D+00
4 0.100000D+00 0.761D+01
5 0.355987D+02 0.608D+00
6 0.100000D+00 0.155D+01
IT NF F RELDF PRELDF RELDX MODEL STPPAR D*STEP
NPRELDF
0 1 0.848D+00
1 2 0.261D-02 0.10D+01 0.10D+01 0.2D-05 G 0.0D+00 0.7D+00
0.10D+01
2 3 0.121D-03 0.95D+00 0.96D+00 0.2D-06 G 0.0D+00 0.1D+00
0.96D+00
3 4 0.109D-03 0.10D+00 0.10D+00 0.2D-08 G 0.0D+00 0.9D-03
0.10D+00
***** X-CONVERGENCE *****
FUNCTION 0.108736D-03 RELDX 0.210D-08
FUNC. EVALS 4 GRAD. EVALS 24
PRELDF 0.100D+00 NPRELDF 0.100D+00
I FINAL X(I) D(I) G(I)
1 -0.197507D+06 0.100D+01 -0.319D-06
2 0.172755D+00 0.129D+01 0.251D-04
3 0.144346D+02 0.411D+00 0.223D-05
4 0.102224D-01 0.822D+01 -0.376D-06
5 0.357076D+02 0.608D+00 -0.462D-08
6 0.382409D-01 0.187D+01 -0.262D-07
Parabolic equation of state: info 3
E = x1 + x2(a-x3)^2
+ x4(b-x5)^2 + x6(a-x3)(b-x5)
Fitparameter are
-197507.051608 0.172755 14.434559
0.010222 ------------------ *Say this is Eqn.-(2)*
35.707596 0.038241
lattic parameters energy de(EOS)
14.021960 34.697070 -197506.997315 0.001500
13.929700 35.158170 -197506.995255 0.001373
************** skipping some data here************
My queries are:
1. I did not relax the forces for optimization as there always be some
forces due to lattice strains if we optimize the structure. So I wish to
relax the structure with these parameters and then wish to do further
calculations. Am I right?
2. Why there is the difference between the lattice parameters obtained in
Eqn.(1) and Eqn. (2), and which data I should consider for further
calculations/
3. The B-M Eqn fit gave me below parameters:
V0,B(GPa),BP,E0 6477.0172 25.2686 5.0558
-197507.048851
while in graph obtained from B-M. Eqn I see a slight variation in these
parameters:
V0,B(GPa),BP,E0 6477.6387, 24.7964, 5.7605, -197507.048792
4. In the link (provided below) for 2Doptimization, it is mentioned for
clmextrapol_lapw that "Convert it to #clmextrapol_lapw for SP case"
As my case is AFM and I did not follow this instruction, how it may
influence mine optimizes lattice parameters?
http://susi.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/reg_user/textbooks/2Doptimize.pdf
<http://susi.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/reg_user/textbooks/2Doptimize.pdf>
It would be nice for me if I get inlined reply.
Kind regards
Bhamu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20180530/1a0ac2ad/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Wien
mailing list