[Wien] [SPAM?] How to obtain ELNES simulation results consistent with experiments ?
Peter Blaha
pblaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Mon Oct 15 14:31:49 CEST 2018
I do not understand your statement:
> As it is supercell, I calculated every peak of unequivalent O K edge and
> summed them. I'm not sure all the steps I have done are right. The
Of course, only atom 7 has the core hole, the other atoms of the
supercell can contribute to screening. But only the spectrum of atom 7
is meaningful, not that of the other O atoms. So don't sum up anything,
just calculate the spectrum for atom 7.
On 10/15/18 1:53 PM, yfding wrote:
> This problem haunts me for nearly a year, and my questions are still
> unsolved after consulting a lot of literature and mailing list.
>
> I tried to get Oxygen K edge of the 3*3*3 SrCrO3 supercell.
>
> In my calculations, I first converted the SrCrO3 (space group P4/mmm)
> into a SrCrO3 3*3*3 supercell (space group P1) in CrystalMaker, then
> transformed the SrCrO3supercell.cif file into SrCrO3supercell.struct
> file under the Wien2k case directory, labelled one oxygen atom to make
> this atom unique, did initialization, and accepted all the queries from
> nn complaints. The initialization parameters were as follows:
>
> Rmt: Sr:2.40 Cr:1.78 O:1.61
> potential: GGA of PBE-96
> separation energy: -6.0 Ry
> RKmax: 7.0
> Max L in WF: 10
> number of k points in the whole BZ: 5*5*5
> number of k points in the irreducible wedge of the BZ: 18
>
> Then I edited SrCrO3.inc and removed one core electron from the 7th
> atom, i.e. 1st Oxygen atom 1s state. Next I changed 0.0 to -1.0 in
> SrCrO3.inm. Then run SCF in parallel (energy convergence 0.0001 Ry).
>
> Then,
> -edited case.innes :
>
> SrCrO3 O K edge
> 7 (atom)
> 1, 0 (n, l core)
> 532 (E-Loss of 1st edge in eV)
> 200 (energy of the incident electrons in keV)
> -5.0 20.0 0.1 (minimum energy, energy step, maximum energy)
> 0.37 0.75 (collection semiangle, convergence semiangle, both in mrad)
> 50 1 (NR, NT, defining the integration mesh in the detector plane)
> 0.7 (spectrometer broadening in eV)
> OUTPUT
> 0 (full output)
> DETECTOR POSITION
> 0.0 0.0 (thetax, thetay)
> MODUS
> energy (dscs wrt what?)
> ORIENTATION SENSITIVE
> 0.0 0.0 0.0
> SELECTION RULE
> n (selection rule)
> LSELECTION RULE
> d
> INITIALIZATION
> y y (dos and xdos handling)
> y y (handling of rotation matrices)
> QGRID
> U
> END
>
> - x lapw1
> - x lapw2 -qtl
> - x qtl -telnes
> - x telnes3
> - x broadening
>
> As it is supercell, I calculated every peak of unequivalent O K edge and
> summed them. I'm not sure all the steps I have done are right. The
> result is different from the TEM EELS experiment (The O K edge EELS
> spectra were studied on an JEOL ARM200F Cs-corrected TEM with a FEG and
> a Gatan parallel electron-energy-loss spectroscope). The relative
> strength and position of the peaks are completely inconsistent.
>
> It's not just this example, but I've had the same problem with all the
> other materials. I thought about all the possible reasons, and looked up
> lots of literature and mailing lists, but I couldn't get the calculation
> results closer to the experiment. I want to know how to obtain ELNES
> simulation results consistent with experiments ?
>
> Any comment(s) would be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance!
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
>
--
P.Blaha
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300 FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
Email: blaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at WIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at
WWW: http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at/TC_Blaha
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Wien
mailing list